Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2026
Digital Analysis of Occlusal Contacts in Angle Class II and Class III Malocclusion.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bogatinovska Irena, Gavrilovikj Irena
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the number, interocclusal distance categories, and spatial distribution of occlusal contacts per subject in Angle Class II and Class III malocclusions using digital intraoral models.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This exploratory, cross-sectional study evaluated 60 untreated subjects (30 Class II, 30 Class III). Digital models were obtained via the Medit i600 intraoral scanner, and contact analysis was performed using the Medit Occlusion Analyzer software. Variables represented the cumulative number of teeth per subject. Data were analyzed using median and interquartile range (IQR). Intergroup comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U tests (α = 0.05), with effect size estimated using rank-biserial correlation (rB).
RESULTS: Premolar contacts showed no significant intergroup differences regarding interocclusal distance (p > 0.05). However, Class III subjects exhibited significantly more molar contacts within the 0.050-0.100 mm distance range (p = 0.018). Full-surface contacts were significantly more frequent in Class II patients for both premolars (p = 0.002) and molars (p = 0.007). Class II subjects also showed a highly significant complete absence of molar contacts (p < 0.001). Palatal distribution of premolar contacts showed a borderline difference (p = 0.044), interpreted as a clinical trend.
CONCLUSION: Digital analysis revealed specific patterns in the interocclusal distance and distribution of occlusal contacts in Angle Class II and Class III malocclusions. Intraoral scanning provided objective geometric data that can serve as a valuable adjunct for individualized treatment planning.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This exploratory, cross-sectional study evaluated 60 untreated subjects (30 Class II, 30 Class III). Digital models were obtained via the Medit i600 intraoral scanner, and contact analysis was performed using the Medit Occlusion Analyzer software. Variables represented the cumulative number of teeth per subject. Data were analyzed using median and interquartile range (IQR). Intergroup comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U tests (α = 0.05), with effect size estimated using rank-biserial correlation (rB).
RESULTS: Premolar contacts showed no significant intergroup differences regarding interocclusal distance (p > 0.05). However, Class III subjects exhibited significantly more molar contacts within the 0.050-0.100 mm distance range (p = 0.018). Full-surface contacts were significantly more frequent in Class II patients for both premolars (p = 0.002) and molars (p = 0.007). Class II subjects also showed a highly significant complete absence of molar contacts (p < 0.001). Palatal distribution of premolar contacts showed a borderline difference (p = 0.044), interpreted as a clinical trend.
CONCLUSION: Digital analysis revealed specific patterns in the interocclusal distance and distribution of occlusal contacts in Angle Class II and Class III malocclusions. Intraoral scanning provided objective geometric data that can serve as a valuable adjunct for individualized treatment planning.