MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/jaha.124.038917

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025

Sex Differences in the Participation in Secondary Prevention Stroke Studies.

Moelgg Kurt, Karisik Anel, Buergi Lucie, Carcel Cheryl, Christensen Hanne, Silva Gisele Sampaio, Dejakum Benjamin, Komarek Silvia, Domig Lena, Rinner Heinrich, Granna Julian, Willeit Karin, Willeit Johann, Pechlaner Raimund, Boehme Christian, Mayer-Suess Lukas, Toell Thomas, Kiechl Stefan, Knoflach Michael

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Women show higher age-standardized mortality rates for ischemic stroke. Nevertheless, women are underrepresented in secondary stroke prevention trials. Our analysis investigated contributors to reduced study participation among women in a comprehensive stroke center in Austria.

METHODS

The population-based Tyrolean Stroke Pathway database was used to describe sex distribution in patients with ischemic stroke in the region and at the study site. Screening logs from 3 secondary stroke prevention studies at the Medical University of Innsbruck were analyzed containing information on age, self-reported sex, and causes for nonparticipation. Binary and multinomial logistic regression were performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Women constituted 45.6% of all patients with ischemic stroke in the federal region and 43.1% at the study site. Of 4511 patients screened, 68.1% were included in at least 1 stroke trial, 39.5% of whom were female. Screened women were older than screened men, median age (interquartile range) of 76 (66-83) versus 72 (61-80) years. Women showed higher odds than men of receiving comfort terminal care (OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.14-2.05]), being unable to provide informed consent (OR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.54-2.47]) due to aphasia (OR, 2.79 [95% CI, 1.91-4.06]) or cognitive impairment (OR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.30-2.95]), and being ineligible for study participation based on inclusion and exclusion criteria (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.04-1.58]). When adjusting for age, women were not more likely than men to refuse study participation (OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.84-1.43]).

CONCLUSIONS

Female sex was associated with higher odds of exclusion from studies due to comorbidities and more severe neurological deficits. However, in our analysis women were not more likely to refuse study participation.

Для цитирования: Moelgg Kurt, Karisik Anel, Buergi Lucie, Carcel Cheryl, Christensen Hanne, Silva Gisele Sampaio, Dejakum Benjamin, Komarek Silvia, Domig Lena, Rinner Heinrich, Granna Julian, Willeit Karin, Willeit Johann, Pechlaner Raimund, Boehme Christian, Mayer-Suess Lukas, Toell Thomas, Kiechl Stefan, Knoflach Michael. Sex Differences in the Participation in Secondary Prevention Stroke Studies.. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2025. DOI: 10.1161/jaha.124.038917.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.