MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s40263-024-01127-7

Медицинская библиотека · CNS drugs · 2024

TICA-CLOP STUDY: Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Acute Moderate and Moderate-to-Severe Ischemic Stroke, a Randomized Controlled Multi-Center Trial.

Ahmed Sherihan Rezk, Nahas Nevine El, Khalil Mohamed Fouad Elsayed, Elbassiouny Ahmed, Almoataz Mohamed Ahmed, Omar Tarek Youssif, Daabis Ahmed Mohamed Ali, Refat Hossam Mohamed, Ebied Ahmed Ahmed Mohamed Kamal, Hassan Asmaa Mohammed, Mohamed Diaa Mostafa Atiaa, Ismaiel Mohamed, Zeinhom Mohamed G

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Many studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with ischemic stroke; none of these trials included North African participants, and all of these trials comprised only participants who experienced transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke.

OBJECTIVES

We compared the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with first-ever noncardioembolic moderate or moderate-to-severe ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Our trial involved 900 first-ever noncardioembolic patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who randomly received either loading and maintenance doses of ticagrelor or clopidogrel within the first 24 h of stroke onset.

RESULTS

We involved 900 patients in the intention-to-treat analysis. A total of 39 (8.7%) patients in ticagrelor arm and 62 (13.8%) in clopidogrel arm experienced a new stroke [hazard ratio (HR) 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.83; P value = 0.006]. A total of 57 (12.7%) patients in ticagrelor group and 80 (17.8%) patients in clopidogrel group experienced composite of new stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or death due to vascular insults (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.43-0.82; P value = 0.004). Participants who received ticagrelor experienced less frequent unfavorable outcomes. We found no significant variation between our study's two arms concerning the hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic complications.

CONCLUSION

Patients with noncardioembolic moderate or moderate-to-severe ischemic stroke who received ticagrelor within the first 24 h after ischemic stroke had better clinical outcomes based on recurrent stroke rates and unfavorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) rates compared with those who received clopidogrel. There were no significant variations between ticagrelor and clopidogrel regarding hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic complications.

REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number NCT05553613.

Для цитирования: Ahmed Sherihan Rezk, Nahas Nevine El, Khalil Mohamed Fouad Elsayed, Elbassiouny Ahmed, Almoataz Mohamed Ahmed, Omar Tarek Youssif, Daabis Ahmed Mohamed Ali, Refat Hossam Mohamed, Ebied Ahmed Ahmed Mohamed Kamal, Hassan Asmaa Mohammed, Mohamed Diaa Mostafa Atiaa, Ismaiel Mohamed, Zeinhom Mohamed G. TICA-CLOP STUDY: Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Acute Moderate and Moderate-to-Severe Ischemic Stroke, a Randomized Controlled Multi-Center Trial.. CNS drugs. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s40263-024-01127-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.