MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/qad.0000000000003763

Медицинская библиотека · AIDS (London, England) · 2023

Dynamic choice HIV prevention intervention at outpatient departments in rural Kenya and Uganda.

Koss Catherine A, Ayieko James, Kabami Jane, Balzer Laura B, Kakande Elijah, Sunday Helen, Nyabuti Marilyn, Wafula Erick, Shade Starley B, Biira Edith, Opel Fred, Atuhaire Hellen N, Okochi Hideaki, Ogachi Sabina, Gandhi Monica, Bacon Melanie C, Bukusi Elizabeth A, Chamie Gabriel, Petersen Maya L, Kamya Moses R, Havlir Diane V, SEARCH study team

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

HIV prevention service delivery models that offer product choices, and the option to change preferences over time, may increase prevention coverage. Outpatient departments in sub-Saharan Africa diagnose a high proportion of new HIV infections, but are an understudied entry point to biomedical prevention.

DESIGN

Individually randomized trial of dynamic choice HIV prevention (DCP) intervention vs. standard-of-care (SOC) among individuals with current/anticipated HIV exposure risk at outpatient departments in rural Kenya and Uganda (SEARCH; NCT04810650).

METHODS

Our DCP intervention included 1) product choice (oral preexposure prophylaxis [PrEP] or postexposure prophylaxis [PEP]) with an option to switch over time, 2) HIV provider- or self-testing, 3) service location choice (community vs. clinic-based), and 4) provider training on patient-centered care. Primary outcome was proportion of follow-up covered by PrEP/PEP over 48 weeks assessed via self-report.

RESULTS

We enrolled 403 participants (61% women; median 27 years, IQR 22-37). In the DCP arm, 86% ever chose PrEP, 15% ever chose PEP over 48 weeks; selection of HIV self-testing increased from 26 to 51% and of out-of-facility visits from 8 to 52%. Among 376 of 403 (93%) with outcomes ascertained, time covered by PrEP/PEP was higher in DCP (47.5%) vs. SOC (18.3%); difference = 29.2% (95% confidence interval: 22.7-35.7; P  < 0.001). Effects were similar among women and men (28.2 and 31.0% higher coverage in DCP, respectively) and larger during periods of self-reported HIV risk (DCP 64.9% vs. SOC 26.3%; difference = 38.6%; 95% confidence interval: 31.0-46.2; P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A dynamic choice HIV prevention intervention resulted in two-fold greater time covered by biomedical prevention products compared to SOC in general outpatient departments in eastern Africa.

Для цитирования: Koss Catherine A, Ayieko James, Kabami Jane, Balzer Laura B, Kakande Elijah, Sunday Helen, Nyabuti Marilyn, Wafula Erick, Shade Starley B, Biira Edith, Opel Fred, Atuhaire Hellen N, Okochi Hideaki, Ogachi Sabina, Gandhi Monica, Bacon Melanie C, Bukusi Elizabeth A, Chamie Gabriel, Petersen Maya L, Kamya Moses R, Havlir Diane V, SEARCH study team. Dynamic choice HIV prevention intervention at outpatient departments in rural Kenya and Uganda.. AIDS (London, England). 2023. DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000003763.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.