DOI 10.33029/1027-6661-2025-31-3-72-77
[Prosthetic repair of the ascending aorta in patients with normal and variant anatomy of the brachiocephalic trunk].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To comparatively analyze early results of surgical treatment of patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta in normal and variant anatomy of the brachiocephalic trunk.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
Our retrospective study included a total of 259 patients operated on for ascending aortic aneurysms. Depending on the anatomy of the brachiocephalic trunk (BCT), the patients were divided into two groups. Group I consisted of 202 patients with normal anatomy of the BCT and Group II comprised 57 patients having variant anatomy of the BCT, with the BCT and left common carotid artery originating from the aorta in a solitary-ostium manner. We analyzed both intra- and postoperative data.
RESULTS
The duration of artificial circulation and circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion was comparable in patients of both groups. Analyzing the course of the postoperative period revealed 11 (5.4%) neurological events in Group I patients and 2 (3.5%) neurological events in Group II patients (p=0.542). Prolonged pulmonary ventilation was required in 14 (6.9%) Group I patients and in 1 (1.7%) Group II patient (p=0.142); resternotomy for hemorrhagic complications was required in 6 (2.9%) and 4 (7.01%) Group I and Group II patients, respectively (p=0.170). Hospital mortality in Group I amounted to 7 (3.4%) patients, with no lethality in Group II (p=0.152).
CONCLUSION
The anatomical structure of the brachiocephalic trunk is not a factor influencing the result of prosthetic repair of the ascending aorta ('hemiarch').
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.