MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/yco.0000000000001040

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in psychiatry · 2025

From categories to traits: assessing personality dysfunction in ICD-11 and the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders.

Bornstein Robert F

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A paradigm shift in the assessment of personality pathology is underway, as diagnosticians move beyond traditional personality disorder categories and assess personality dysfunction using contemporary dimensional frameworks. This article describes the assessment of personality pathology in ICD-11 and the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD).

RECENT FINDINGS: Recent findings in this area can be grouped into three domains: reliability, factor structure, and temporal stability of ICD-11 and AMPD constructs, convergence of personality pathology ratings with external indices of psychopathology and adjustment, and clinical utility (e.g., usefulness in rendering clinical decisions, prediction of treatment outcome).

SUMMARY: Research in this area confirms that level of personality functioning and the presence of one or more pathological personality traits predict an array of clinical outcomes, including symptom disorders (e.g., anxiety, depression), suicide risk, and psychotherapy effectiveness. Findings support the cross-cultural generalizability of these patterns, and the clinical utility of assessing personality functioning and traits in adolescents and adults.

Для цитирования: Bornstein Robert F. From categories to traits: assessing personality dysfunction in ICD-11 and the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders.. Current opinion in psychiatry. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/yco.0000000000001040.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.