MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100476

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025

The comparative efficacy of comprehensive self-care interventions in chronic illness: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Lee Christopher S, Antoniadou Marianna, Jaarsma Tiny, Riegel Barbara, Westland Heleen

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of self-care interventions is not well understood in part because of variation in the domains of self-care being targeted as well as in modes of intervention delivery and behavioral change techniques used in trials.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to synthesize the efficacy of comprehensive self-care interventions on relevant outcomes across six common chronic illnesses.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis, meta-regression, and subgroup comparisons.

METHODS

Data extraction focused on randomized controlled trials published between 2008 and 2022 designed to enhance comprehensive self-care interventions (i.e. those that focus on all three self-care domains of maintenance, monitoring, and management) in asthma, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and hypertension. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were used to quantify the year of publication and both modes of delivery and behavioral change techniques on intervention efficacy, respectively.

RESULTS

145 interventions tested in 140 trials involving 31,642 participants were included. The efficacy of comprehensive self-care interventions on improving outcomes was moderate in effect size and heterogeneous (g = 0.40 (95%CI=0.35-0.45), p < 0.001; χ2=898.7, p < 0.001, I 2=83.9%). In meta-regression, the efficacy of interventions improved linearly between 2008 and 2022 (slope = 0.017 (95%CI=0.001-0.032); z = 2.08, p = 0.038). Interventions using individual face-to-face or telephone modes of delivery, and those employing behavioral feedback, social support or reminders were more efficacious compared with interventions that did not use these features (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive self-care interventions have moderate efficacy in improving outcomes, especially those using certain modes of delivery and behavioral change techniques, and should be considered for adults with chronic illness.

Для цитирования: Lee Christopher S, Antoniadou Marianna, Jaarsma Tiny, Riegel Barbara, Westland Heleen. The comparative efficacy of comprehensive self-care interventions in chronic illness: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. International journal of nursing studies advances. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100476.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.