MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · European journal of dermatology : EJD · 2002

The cytoprotective effect of amifostine in acute radiation dermatitis: a retrospective analysis.

Kouvaris John, Kouloulias Vassilis, Kokakis John, Matsopoulos George, Myrsini Balafouta, Vlahos Lambros

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

To study the impact of amifostine as a cytoprotective agent against acute radiation dermatitis, we reviewed 220 patient records. One hundred cancer patients, with tumors localised in the pelvis (bladder, rectum, prostatic carcinomas, or gynecological cancer), who received radiotherapy and cytoprotective treatment with intravenous infusion of amifostine (group A) were included in this study. Retrospectively, we randomly selected from a database in our hospital 120 historical controls, who received only radiotherapy without cytoprotection (group B). Mean gross dermatitis score (MGDS) was the mean value of recorded acute radiation dermatitis according to common toxicity criteria. In group A versus B patients, a significantly reduced severity of dermatitis (P < 0.001, Fisher's exact test) and significant reduction of MGDS as well as mean interruption treatment time (P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test) was observed. The relative risk of the outcome of the two study groups was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.34). The significant dermato-cytoprotective effect of amifostine noticed in our retrospective analysis warrants further investigation with randomised trials.

Для цитирования: Kouvaris John, Kouloulias Vassilis, Kokakis John, Matsopoulos George, Myrsini Balafouta, Vlahos Lambros. The cytoprotective effect of amifostine in acute radiation dermatitis: a retrospective analysis.. European journal of dermatology : EJD. 2002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.