DOI 10.1227/ons.0000000000000593
Flow Diversion as Destination Treatment of Intracranial Mycotic Aneurysms: A Retrospective Case Series.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Mycotic aneurysms represent a rare type of intracranial aneurysm. Treatment options usually consist of coiling, clipping, or liquid embolization. Data regarding outcomes after flow diversion of mycotic aneurysms are sparse.
OBJECTIVE
To present a single-center case series regarding our experience with FD as definitive treatment for ruptured mycotic aneurysms initially treated with coil embolization.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of all cerebrovascular procedures performed at a single institution between 2017 and 2021 for cases that used FD for the management of intracranial mycotic aneurysms. Prospectively collected data included patient demographics, medical history, rupture status, aneurysm morphology, aneurysm location, and periprocedural complications. The main outcomes included neurological examination and radiographic occlusion rate on cerebral digital subtraction angiography.
RESULTS
Three patients with 4 ruptured mycotic aneurysms that were initially treated with coil embolization were identified that required retreatment. The aneurysms were located along the middle cerebral artery bifurcation (n = 2), posterior cerebral artery P1/2 junction (n = 1), and basilar artery apex (n = 1), which all demonstrated recurrence after initial coil embolization. Successful retreatment using flow diverting stents was performed in all 3 patients. At the last angiographic follow-up, all aneurysms demonstrated complete occlusion. No patients suffered new periprocedural complications or neurological deficits after FD.
CONCLUSION
Flow-diverting stents may be an effective treatment option for intracranial mycotic aneurysms that are refractory to previous endovascular coiling. Future studies are warranted to establish the associated long-term safety and clinical efficacy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.