Journal of infection in developing countries · 2023
Adherence to HIV post-exposure prophylaxis in a specialized service in São Paulo, Brazil.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Silva Marcos Morais Santos, Duarte Luciane Simões, Nichiata Lucia Yasuko Izumi
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) depends on adherence to the protocol, which includes taking antiretrovirals (ARVs) and attending visits. We examined the adherence rate to antiretroviral agents and follow-up visits identifying the associated characteristics of adherence and the reasons for not attending HIV PEP consultations in a specialized service in São Paulo, Brazil.
METHODOLOGY: This was a cross-sectional study with health service users who had an indication for PEP due to sexual exposure in an HIV/AIDS service from April to October 2019. The health service users were followed-up throughout the prophylaxis cycle. Adherence was determined through self-reports on antiretroviral agent use and attendance to follow-up consultations.
RESULTS: Association measures were employed to identify adherence-related characteristics. The sample analyzed included 91 users. The mean age was 32.5 years old (SD = 9.8). The largest share was white-skinned (49.5%), men who have sex with other men (62.2%), male (86.8%), and undergraduate/graduate students (65.9%). Adherence totaled 56.7% and health insurance was the associated characteristic (p = 0.039). Work (55.9%), using a private service (15.2%), forgetfulness (11.8%) and considering follow-up unnecessary (11.8%) were the main reasons for not attending the follow-up appointments.
CONCLUSIONS: Few users do attend HIV PEP consultations. The users without health insurance had the highest adherence percentage whereas work was mentioned as a reason for not attending HIV PEP consultations.
METHODOLOGY: This was a cross-sectional study with health service users who had an indication for PEP due to sexual exposure in an HIV/AIDS service from April to October 2019. The health service users were followed-up throughout the prophylaxis cycle. Adherence was determined through self-reports on antiretroviral agent use and attendance to follow-up consultations.
RESULTS: Association measures were employed to identify adherence-related characteristics. The sample analyzed included 91 users. The mean age was 32.5 years old (SD = 9.8). The largest share was white-skinned (49.5%), men who have sex with other men (62.2%), male (86.8%), and undergraduate/graduate students (65.9%). Adherence totaled 56.7% and health insurance was the associated characteristic (p = 0.039). Work (55.9%), using a private service (15.2%), forgetfulness (11.8%) and considering follow-up unnecessary (11.8%) were the main reasons for not attending the follow-up appointments.
CONCLUSIONS: Few users do attend HIV PEP consultations. The users without health insurance had the highest adherence percentage whereas work was mentioned as a reason for not attending HIV PEP consultations.