MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.11477/mf.1436204655

Медицинская библиотека · No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery · 2022

[Cerebral Blood Vessels and Infection].

Kanoke Atsushi, Endo Hidenori, Tominaga Teiji

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Infectious intracranial aneurysms(IIAs)are rare cerebrovascular complications of systemic infections induced by microbial infiltration and degradation of the arterial vessel wall. Prospective or population-wide studies of the epidemiology, natural history, or management of IIAs have not been conducted. In this study, we present the epidemiological and angiographical features, management, and outcomes of IIAs based on published case series and retrospective studies. Most IIAs were small in size(< 5 mm), with aneurysms located in the middle cerebral artery followed by the posterior cerebral artery. Endovascular interventions for IIAs have increased since coils, liquid embolic materials, and microcatheter became more sophisticated, allowing them to reach more distal branches. Open surgery is still required in cases with large clots or in cases involving branches feeding the eloquent areas, which cannot be sacrificed. These multimodal approaches for managing IIAs have achieved satisfactory results. Septic cavernous sinus thrombosis is also a rare, life-threatening complication of head and neck infections. Several antibiotics and antivirals are used in combination with anticoagulants. However, no consensus has been reached because of a lack of randomized controlled trials and large population-based studies.

Для цитирования: Kanoke Atsushi, Endo Hidenori, Tominaga Teiji. [Cerebral Blood Vessels and Infection].. No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.11477/mf.1436204655.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.