The British journal of surgery · 1997
Restorative caecogastroplasty reconstruction after pylorus-preserving near-total gastrectomy: a preliminary study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Uras C, Yigitbasi R, Erturk S, Hamzaoglu I, Sayman H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A wide range of inevitable adverse effects may emerge after total gastrectomy, mainly due to loss of reservoir organ and exclusion of the duodenal route. None of the available reconstructive methods has achieved a satisfactory functional result. A new method has been tried to overcome postgastrectomy problems.
METHODS: In this preliminary clinical study, a reconstruction technique involving interposition of the ileocaecal segment as a gastric substitute after pylorus-preserving near-total gastrectomy (restorative caecogastroplasty) was applied in six selected patients with proximal gastric carcinoma.
RESULTS: Postoperative radiological and scintigraphic studies revealed adequate reservoir capacity, satisfactory neogastric emptying and a well functioning pyloric mechanism. During mean follow-up of 15 (range 3-36) months, dumping syndrome, reflux oesophagitis and weight loss were not observed.
CONCLUSION: It is suggested that restorative caecogastroplasty combines the advantages of intact sphincter mechanisms and maintaining the duodenal route as well as sufficient reservoir volume. This method can be used safely as an alternative to other methods of reconstruction.
METHODS: In this preliminary clinical study, a reconstruction technique involving interposition of the ileocaecal segment as a gastric substitute after pylorus-preserving near-total gastrectomy (restorative caecogastroplasty) was applied in six selected patients with proximal gastric carcinoma.
RESULTS: Postoperative radiological and scintigraphic studies revealed adequate reservoir capacity, satisfactory neogastric emptying and a well functioning pyloric mechanism. During mean follow-up of 15 (range 3-36) months, dumping syndrome, reflux oesophagitis and weight loss were not observed.
CONCLUSION: It is suggested that restorative caecogastroplasty combines the advantages of intact sphincter mechanisms and maintaining the duodenal route as well as sufficient reservoir volume. This method can be used safely as an alternative to other methods of reconstruction.