MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90378-q

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of medicine · 1990

Evidence of subclinical blastomycosis in forestry workers in northern Minnesota and northern Wisconsin.

Vaaler A K, Bradsher R W, Davies S F

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence of remote subclinical blastomycosis in a high-risk population of forestry workers.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

The study consisted of 39 male forestry workers from northern Minnesota and northern Wisconsin, areas endemic for blastomycosis but not for histoplasmosis. All subjects were histoplasmin skin test-negative, and none had ever been diagnosed with blastomycosis or pneumonia. An antigen-specific lymphocyte stimulation assay was performed to determine the presence of blastomycosis.

RESULTS

Peripheral blood lymphocytes from 12 of 39 subjects demonstrated specific antigen-induced proliferation when stimulated with a purified alkali- and water-soluble antigen derived from the cell wall of Blastomyces dermatitidis.

CONCLUSION

The finding that 30% of these men had evidence of previous blastomycosis suggests that subclinical cases do occur sporadically, and are probably more common than diagnosed symptomatic cases. This is similar to histoplasmosis, in which the majority of infections are subclinical. However, the reservoir of persons with previous undiagnosed blastomycosis is probably small compared to the huge number of persons (perhaps 30 million) with prior histoplasmosis.

Для цитирования: Vaaler A K, Bradsher R W, Davies S F. Evidence of subclinical blastomycosis in forestry workers in northern Minnesota and northern Wisconsin.. The American journal of medicine. 1990. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90378-q.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.