Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
Three-dimensional assessment of interfractional cervical and uterine motions using daily magnetic resonance images to determine margins and timing of replanning.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kishigami Yukako, Nakamura Mitsuhiro, Nakao Megumi, Okamoto Hiroyuki, Takahashi Ayaka, Igaki Hiroshi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the margins and timing of replanning by assessing the daily interfractional cervical and uterine motions using magnetic resonance (MR) images.
METHODS: Eleven patients with cervical cancer, who underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 23-25 fractions, were considered in this study. The daily and reference MR images were converted into three-dimensional (3D) shape models. Patient-specific anisotropic margins were calculated from the proximal 95% of vertices located outside the surface of the reference model. Population-based margins were defined as the 90th percentile values of the patient-specific margins. The expanded volume of interest (expVOI) for the cervix and uterus was generated by expanding the reference model based on the population-based margin to calculate the coverage for daily deformable mesh models. For comparison, expVOIconv was generated using conventional margins: right (R), left (L), anterior (A), posterior (P), superior (S), and inferior (I) were (5, 5, 15, 15, 10, 10) and (10, 10, 20, 20, 15, 15) mm for the cervix and uterus, respectively. Subsequently, a replanning scenario was developed based on the cervical volume change. ExpVOIini and expVOIreplan were generated before and after replanning, respectively.
RESULTS: Population-based margins were (R, L, A, P, S, I) of (7, 7, 11, 6, 11, 8) and (14, 13, 27, 19, 15, 21) mm for the cervix and uterus, respectively. The timing of replanning was found to be the 16th fraction, and the volume of expVOIreplan decreased by >30% compared to that of expVOIini . However, margins cannot be reduced to ensure equivalent coverage after replanning.
CONCLUSION: We determined the margins and timing of replanning through detailed daily analysis. The margins of the cervix were smaller than conventional margins in some directions, while the margins of the uterus were larger in almost all directions. A margin equivalent to that at the initial planning was required for replanning.
METHODS: Eleven patients with cervical cancer, who underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 23-25 fractions, were considered in this study. The daily and reference MR images were converted into three-dimensional (3D) shape models. Patient-specific anisotropic margins were calculated from the proximal 95% of vertices located outside the surface of the reference model. Population-based margins were defined as the 90th percentile values of the patient-specific margins. The expanded volume of interest (expVOI) for the cervix and uterus was generated by expanding the reference model based on the population-based margin to calculate the coverage for daily deformable mesh models. For comparison, expVOIconv was generated using conventional margins: right (R), left (L), anterior (A), posterior (P), superior (S), and inferior (I) were (5, 5, 15, 15, 10, 10) and (10, 10, 20, 20, 15, 15) mm for the cervix and uterus, respectively. Subsequently, a replanning scenario was developed based on the cervical volume change. ExpVOIini and expVOIreplan were generated before and after replanning, respectively.
RESULTS: Population-based margins were (R, L, A, P, S, I) of (7, 7, 11, 6, 11, 8) and (14, 13, 27, 19, 15, 21) mm for the cervix and uterus, respectively. The timing of replanning was found to be the 16th fraction, and the volume of expVOIreplan decreased by >30% compared to that of expVOIini . However, margins cannot be reduced to ensure equivalent coverage after replanning.
CONCLUSION: We determined the margins and timing of replanning through detailed daily analysis. The margins of the cervix were smaller than conventional margins in some directions, while the margins of the uterus were larger in almost all directions. A margin equivalent to that at the initial planning was required for replanning.