Annals of surgical oncology · 2026
Development and Validation of a Novel Pathologic Nodal Staging System for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu Yao, Zhang Xu, Du Wei, Yuan Junhui, Li Wenlu, Fang Qigen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) has transformed the treatment of locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), yet the prognostic reliability of the eighth-edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathologic nodal staging in this context remains unclear. This study sought to develop a ypN staging system for post-NICT OSCC.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 559 patients with locally advanced OSCC who received NICT followed by radical surgery across two centers (training cohort, n = 226; external validation cohort, n = 333). A proposed ypN staging system integrating viable node burden and macro- extranodal extension (ENE) status was developed and externally validated. Model performance was compared with the eighth-edition AJCC staging using Harrell's C-index, the Akaike Information Criterion, and decision curve analysis.
RESULTS: Three prognostic groups emerged (0, 1-2, and ≥3 viable metastatic lymph nodes). Multivariate analysis showed that micro-ENE did not add significant risk (hazard ratio, 1.12; P = 0.79), whereas macro-ENE independently predicted recurrence. The proposed staging framework, which categorizes patients into ypN0 (0 viable nodes), ypN1 (1 to 2 viable nodes without macroscopic ENE), ypN2 (≥3 viable nodes without macroscopic ENE), and ypN3 (≥1 viable nodes with macroscopic ENE), produced a clearly distinct prognostic gradient, with 3-year disease-free survival rates of 84.1, 61.2, 31.8, and 9.1%, respectively. This system outperformed the eighth-edition AJCC staging in both cohorts, demonstrating higher C-indices (0.78 vs 0.70; 0.76 vs 0.69), lower AICs, and superior net clinical benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed ypN staging system, grounded in viable metastatic lymph node burden and macro-ENE, offers improved prognostic discrimination for post-NICT OSCC.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 559 patients with locally advanced OSCC who received NICT followed by radical surgery across two centers (training cohort, n = 226; external validation cohort, n = 333). A proposed ypN staging system integrating viable node burden and macro- extranodal extension (ENE) status was developed and externally validated. Model performance was compared with the eighth-edition AJCC staging using Harrell's C-index, the Akaike Information Criterion, and decision curve analysis.
RESULTS: Three prognostic groups emerged (0, 1-2, and ≥3 viable metastatic lymph nodes). Multivariate analysis showed that micro-ENE did not add significant risk (hazard ratio, 1.12; P = 0.79), whereas macro-ENE independently predicted recurrence. The proposed staging framework, which categorizes patients into ypN0 (0 viable nodes), ypN1 (1 to 2 viable nodes without macroscopic ENE), ypN2 (≥3 viable nodes without macroscopic ENE), and ypN3 (≥1 viable nodes with macroscopic ENE), produced a clearly distinct prognostic gradient, with 3-year disease-free survival rates of 84.1, 61.2, 31.8, and 9.1%, respectively. This system outperformed the eighth-edition AJCC staging in both cohorts, demonstrating higher C-indices (0.78 vs 0.70; 0.76 vs 0.69), lower AICs, and superior net clinical benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed ypN staging system, grounded in viable metastatic lymph node burden and macro-ENE, offers improved prognostic discrimination for post-NICT OSCC.