MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke · 2006

[Pharmacological treatment of pathological gambling].

Pallesen Ståle, Molde Helge, Arnestad Helga Myrseth, Skutle Arvid, Menzoni Rune, Holsten Fred

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The need for effective treatment for pathological gambling is urgent. The majority of treatment studies and available treatments today are based upon cognitive-behavioural therapy. Recently, however, several studies investigating the effects of pharmacological interventions have been published. We conducted a review of these studies.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Studies for inclusion were identified through searches in PubMed covering the period 1950 to June 2005. A total of 12 studies were included.

RESULTS

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and similar compounds were associated with improvement in two out of five placebo-controlled studies and in two out of three studies with a pre-post design. Opioid antagonists were associated with improvement in one placebo-controlled study and in one study with a pre-post design. Mood stabilisers gave improvement in the one placebo-controlled study as well as in both studies with a pre-post design.

INTERPRETATION: Pharmacotherapy may yield beneficial effects in the treatment of pathological gamblers. Still, more well-controlled studies with control of comorbid psychiatric conditions are needed.

Для цитирования: Pallesen Ståle, Molde Helge, Arnestad Helga Myrseth, Skutle Arvid, Menzoni Rune, Holsten Fred. [Pharmacological treatment of pathological gambling].. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 2006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.