JACC. Heart failure · 2026
Myocardial Histopathology-Based Heart Failure Phenotyping.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tersalvi Gregorio, Maleszewski Joseph J, Dasari Surendra, Arab Sammy, Koepp Katlyn E, Wang Ying, Bois Melanie C, AbouEzzeddine Omar F, Fayyaz Ahmed U, Redfield Margaret M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Myocardial hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis are the structural hallmarks evaluated on histopathology in heart failure (HF). Direct study of myocardial tissue has reemerged as a strategy to dissect the biology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but whether these features, assessed together, define distinct subgroups within HF phenotypes remains unknown.
OBJECTIVES: The authors assessed whether phenogroups defined by fibrosis and hypertrophy (histogroups) display distinct clinical profiles and outcomes in HFpEF vs heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
METHODS: The authors identified patients with HF who underwent right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy from 1999 to 2023, after excluding transplant, infiltrative, inflammatory, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy cases. Patients with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≥50%; n = 124) and HFrEF (LVEF <50%; n = 170) were studied. A single cardiac pathologist, blinded to clinical data, graded fibrosis semiquantitatively and measured cardiomyocyte diameter to assess hypertrophy. Prespecified histogroups integrated the severity of fibrosis and hypertrophy. Associations with clinical characteristics and 10-year all-cause mortality were assessed separately in HFpEF and HFrEF.
RESULTS: In HFpEF, more advanced histogroups showed a higher proportion of men, diabetes, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, lower LVEF, and greater left ventricular mass index (P < 0.05 for all), whereas most other clinical and hemodynamic characteristics were similar. The severe histogroup was associated with higher mortality overall and after adjustment for age and sex (severe vs mild: HR: 2.3 [95% CI: 1.05-4.9]; P = 0.037), whereas histogroup was not associated with mortality in HFrEF. The prognostic association differed significantly by HF phenotype (adjusted interaction P = 0.034).
CONCLUSIONS: Integrated assessment of fibrosis and hypertrophy identifies clinically and prognostically distinct histogroups in HFpEF, but not in HFrEF. These findings should be interpreted within the context of a tertiary-referral cohort undergoing diagnostic endomyocardial biopsy.
OBJECTIVES: The authors assessed whether phenogroups defined by fibrosis and hypertrophy (histogroups) display distinct clinical profiles and outcomes in HFpEF vs heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
METHODS: The authors identified patients with HF who underwent right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy from 1999 to 2023, after excluding transplant, infiltrative, inflammatory, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy cases. Patients with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≥50%; n = 124) and HFrEF (LVEF <50%; n = 170) were studied. A single cardiac pathologist, blinded to clinical data, graded fibrosis semiquantitatively and measured cardiomyocyte diameter to assess hypertrophy. Prespecified histogroups integrated the severity of fibrosis and hypertrophy. Associations with clinical characteristics and 10-year all-cause mortality were assessed separately in HFpEF and HFrEF.
RESULTS: In HFpEF, more advanced histogroups showed a higher proportion of men, diabetes, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, lower LVEF, and greater left ventricular mass index (P < 0.05 for all), whereas most other clinical and hemodynamic characteristics were similar. The severe histogroup was associated with higher mortality overall and after adjustment for age and sex (severe vs mild: HR: 2.3 [95% CI: 1.05-4.9]; P = 0.037), whereas histogroup was not associated with mortality in HFrEF. The prognostic association differed significantly by HF phenotype (adjusted interaction P = 0.034).
CONCLUSIONS: Integrated assessment of fibrosis and hypertrophy identifies clinically and prognostically distinct histogroups in HFpEF, but not in HFrEF. These findings should be interpreted within the context of a tertiary-referral cohort undergoing diagnostic endomyocardial biopsy.