Transplantation proceedings · 2018
Duodenal Ulcer as a Postoperative Complication in the Donor in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kadohisa M, Sugawara Y, Shimata K, Kawabata S, Narita Y, Uto K, Yoshii D, Hayashida S, Oya Y, Yamamoto H, Yamamoto H, Inomata Y, Hibi T
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Donor safety is one of the most important factors in living-donor liver transplantation. Duodenal ulcer (DU) is a common postoperative complication. Here we aimed to reveal the risk factors associated with postoperative DU in the donors.
METHODS: Between April 2007 and March 2017, 318 cases underwent donor hepatectomy for liver transplantation at Kumamoto University Hospital. We classified the donors into two groups: a DU group and a non-DU group. DU was defined as mucosal break with unequivocal depth requiring an endoscopic procedure. The characteristics and clinical factors of the donors were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: Postoperative DU occurred in 17 donors during the study period. The mean interval after donor hepatectomy to occurrence of DU was 124.8 ± 185.4 days. The two groups were comparable in terms of age at time of the donor hepatectomy (P = .45). The male-to-female ratio (P = .03) was significantly different between the two groups and left-side hepatectomy was performed more often in the DU group (P = .003). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that left-side hepatectomy was independently associated with postoperative DU in the donors.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicated that left-side hepatectomy is a risk factor for postoperative DU in the donors.
METHODS: Between April 2007 and March 2017, 318 cases underwent donor hepatectomy for liver transplantation at Kumamoto University Hospital. We classified the donors into two groups: a DU group and a non-DU group. DU was defined as mucosal break with unequivocal depth requiring an endoscopic procedure. The characteristics and clinical factors of the donors were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: Postoperative DU occurred in 17 donors during the study period. The mean interval after donor hepatectomy to occurrence of DU was 124.8 ± 185.4 days. The two groups were comparable in terms of age at time of the donor hepatectomy (P = .45). The male-to-female ratio (P = .03) was significantly different between the two groups and left-side hepatectomy was performed more often in the DU group (P = .003). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that left-side hepatectomy was independently associated with postoperative DU in the donors.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicated that left-side hepatectomy is a risk factor for postoperative DU in the donors.