Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2015
Impact of incidental findings on integrated 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with gastric cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tae Chung Hyun, Lee Jun Haeng, Choi Joon Young, Min Byung-Hoon, Rhee Poong-Lyul, Kim Jae J
Аннотация
AIM: Since positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been introduced, many incidental findings have been identified. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of incidental findings on PET/CT in patients with gastric cancer.
METHODS: A total of 421 patients with gastric cancer underwent PET/CT for initial staging. Incidental findings on PET/CT were classified into five categories according to clinical significance--normal variant, benign, probably benign, probably malignant, and definitely malignant. We obtained information regarding follow-up examinations, additional visits, final diagnosis of incidental findings and short-term medical costs for further evaluation.
RESULTS: Eight hundred eighty-two incidental findings were detected in 386 (91.7%) patients. Of 274 incidental findings classified as probably benign, probably malignant or definitely malignant, 130 required one or more additional investigations. Finally, 12 (9.2%) were proved to be associated with second primary malignancy or metastasis of gastric cancer. One hundred twenty-nine additional outpatient visits and 10 additional hospitalizations were needed for evaluating the incidental findings. The treatment strategy for gastric cancer was changed in one patient. The estimated cost of additional investigations was $US283 (95% CI: $US248-$US311) per patient.
CONCLUSION: Incidental findings on PET/CT were common. Although the incidental findings were suspicious of malignancy, most were benign with high costs for additional investigations.
METHODS: A total of 421 patients with gastric cancer underwent PET/CT for initial staging. Incidental findings on PET/CT were classified into five categories according to clinical significance--normal variant, benign, probably benign, probably malignant, and definitely malignant. We obtained information regarding follow-up examinations, additional visits, final diagnosis of incidental findings and short-term medical costs for further evaluation.
RESULTS: Eight hundred eighty-two incidental findings were detected in 386 (91.7%) patients. Of 274 incidental findings classified as probably benign, probably malignant or definitely malignant, 130 required one or more additional investigations. Finally, 12 (9.2%) were proved to be associated with second primary malignancy or metastasis of gastric cancer. One hundred twenty-nine additional outpatient visits and 10 additional hospitalizations were needed for evaluating the incidental findings. The treatment strategy for gastric cancer was changed in one patient. The estimated cost of additional investigations was $US283 (95% CI: $US248-$US311) per patient.
CONCLUSION: Incidental findings on PET/CT were common. Although the incidental findings were suspicious of malignancy, most were benign with high costs for additional investigations.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18Follow-Up StudiesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedIncidental FindingsMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingNeoplasm StagingNeoplasms, Second PrimaryPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsTissue DistributionTomography, X-Ray Computed