[Mannheim peritonitis index as a surgical criterion for perforative duodenal ulcer].

AIM: to define the correlation between Mannheim peritonitis index scores and outcomes of different radical and palliative interventions for perforative duodenal ulcer.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Treatment of 386 patients with perforative duodenal ulcer is presented. Different surgical techniques were analyzed including stomach resection, various methods of vagotomy with/without drainage, ulcer suturing and ulcerative edges excision with suturing in patients with Mannheim index scores <21, 21-29 and over 29. Clavien-Dindo classification was used to analyze postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In 64.3% of cases mortality was caused by peritonitis and peritonitis-associated complications. Surgical features resulted unfavorable outcome only in 35.7% of cases. Severe complications requiring re-operation were predominantly observed after stomach resection.

CONCLUSION

Mannheim peritonitis index is sensitive method allowing prognosis the outcomes in patients with perforative duodenal ulcer. Radical interventions are advisable in Mannheim index scores <21, in other cases palliative surgery for example suturing or edges excision with suturing is preferred. If radical surgery is performed with strict indications (Mannheim index scores <21) volume and type of surgery do not significantly influence on mortality rate.