Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · 2013
Analysis of interobserver variability for endomicroscopy of the gastrointestinal tract.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hoffman Arthur, Rey Johannes Wilhelm, Mueller Lena, Hansen Torsten, Goetz Martin, Tresch Achim, Galle Peter Robert, Kiesslich Ralf
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Endomicroscopy allows in vivo microscopic investigation of enteral mucosa during endoscopic examinations. The aim of this study was to determine interobserver variability in the evaluation of endomicroscopic pictures of several organs by groups of investigators composed of confocal experts, pathologists and students.
METHODS: Twenty-five selected representative endomicroscopic pictures of the colon, stomach and oesophagus (total number, 75) were evaluated based on tissue, inflammatory and neoplastic changes (secondary endpoints). The endomicroscopic presence of neoplastic features was the primary endpoint and correlated with the final histological diagnosis.
RESULTS: The kappa values for experts examining colon, stomach, and oesophagus pictures were 0.80, 0.91, and 0.488, respectively; for students 0.74, 0.684, and 0.527 and for pathologists 0.749, 0.633, and 0.346, respectively. Neoplasia was accurately diagnosed in 67-97% of patients with no significant differences between the 3 groups. Tissue differentiation was determined best by pathologists, whereas the degree of inflammation was better diagnosed by experts and students. In all 3 groups the diagnosis of oesophageal diseases was the most difficult.
CONCLUSIONS: Endomicroscopic images can be interpreted with high concordance. In our study, the diagnostic reliability was not different between students, endomicroscopic experts, and pathologists. Thus, endomicroscopy could be an additional and reliable imaging modality for diagnosing mucosal neoplasia of the gut.
METHODS: Twenty-five selected representative endomicroscopic pictures of the colon, stomach and oesophagus (total number, 75) were evaluated based on tissue, inflammatory and neoplastic changes (secondary endpoints). The endomicroscopic presence of neoplastic features was the primary endpoint and correlated with the final histological diagnosis.
RESULTS: The kappa values for experts examining colon, stomach, and oesophagus pictures were 0.80, 0.91, and 0.488, respectively; for students 0.74, 0.684, and 0.527 and for pathologists 0.749, 0.633, and 0.346, respectively. Neoplasia was accurately diagnosed in 67-97% of patients with no significant differences between the 3 groups. Tissue differentiation was determined best by pathologists, whereas the degree of inflammation was better diagnosed by experts and students. In all 3 groups the diagnosis of oesophageal diseases was the most difficult.
CONCLUSIONS: Endomicroscopic images can be interpreted with high concordance. In our study, the diagnostic reliability was not different between students, endomicroscopic experts, and pathologists. Thus, endomicroscopy could be an additional and reliable imaging modality for diagnosing mucosal neoplasia of the gut.