MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy · 2010

[A case of Stage IV AFP producing gastric cancer with long-term survival treated by adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1].

Sano Takanori, Usuki Hisashi, Takebayashi Ryusuke, Akamoto Shintaro, Inoue Tatsushi, Kakinoki Keitaro, Hagiike Masanobu, Okano Keiichi, Izuishi Kunihiko, Suzuki Yasuyuki

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A 66-year-old woman underwent a total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer of cardia. The histological diagnosis was moderately-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma and the pathological Stage was IV: T4 (diaphragm), N2, M0. Microscopically, there were findings of severe lymphatic and venous invasions with intravenous tumor thrombus around the splenic hilum. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed AFP production of the tumor. The risk of recurrence was considered very high and her prognosis very poor. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. There was no finding of recurrence in the series of postoperative follow-up examinations. Previous reports describe the prognosis of AFP producing gastric cancer as very poor. In several cases, however, aggressive treatments for AFP producing gastric cancer may result in a better prognosis. This is a long survival case of AFP producing gastric cancer successfully treated with S-1 after surgery.

Для цитирования: Sano Takanori, Usuki Hisashi, Takebayashi Ryusuke, Akamoto Shintaro, Inoue Tatsushi, Kakinoki Keitaro, Hagiike Masanobu, Okano Keiichi, Izuishi Kunihiko, Suzuki Yasuyuki. [A case of Stage IV AFP producing gastric cancer with long-term survival treated by adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1].. Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy. 2010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.