Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2008
Surface pattern classification by enhanced-magnification endoscopy for identifying early gastric cancers.
Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tanaka Kyosuke, Toyoda Hideki, Kadowaki Shigenori, Hamada Yasuhiko, Kosaka Ryo, Matsuzaki Shinpei, Shiraishi Taizo, Imoto Ichiro, Takei Yoshiyuki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The correlation between fine surface patterns of gastric mucosal lesions and early gastric cancer is not sufficiently clear.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of surface pattern classification by enhanced-magnification endoscopy (EME) for identifying early gastric cancers.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SETTING: All procedures were performed at Mie University Hospital.
PATIENTS: A total of 380 consecutive patients who underwent EGD by using magnification endoscopy. Among these subjects were found 250 newly detected lesions suspected of being gastric cancer.
METHODS: Conventional magnification endoscopy (CME), magnification chromoendoscopy (MCE), and EME were performed, and surface patterns of lesions were classified into 5 types: type I, small round pits of uniform size and shape; type II, slit-like pits; type III, gyrus and villous patterns; type IV, irregular arrangement and size; and type V, destructive pattern. Biopsy specimens were obtained from all lesions.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Correlation between surface pattern classification by EME and histopathologic findings of early gastric cancer.
RESULTS: Surface patterns were evident by CME/MCE in only 66.4% (166/250) of lesions but in 100% (250/250) of lesions by EME. Classification by EME was as follows: type I, 52 lesions; type II, 12; type III, 146; type IV, 32; and type V, 8. By histopathologic examination, 16 early gastric cancers were detected between type IV or V lesions. Thus, classification of types IV-V strongly correlated with the presence of gastric cancer (sensitivity 100%, specificity 89.7%).
LIMITATIONS: Single-center study.
CONCLUSIONS: Surface pattern classification by EME may be useful for identifying early gastric cancers.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of surface pattern classification by enhanced-magnification endoscopy (EME) for identifying early gastric cancers.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SETTING: All procedures were performed at Mie University Hospital.
PATIENTS: A total of 380 consecutive patients who underwent EGD by using magnification endoscopy. Among these subjects were found 250 newly detected lesions suspected of being gastric cancer.
METHODS: Conventional magnification endoscopy (CME), magnification chromoendoscopy (MCE), and EME were performed, and surface patterns of lesions were classified into 5 types: type I, small round pits of uniform size and shape; type II, slit-like pits; type III, gyrus and villous patterns; type IV, irregular arrangement and size; and type V, destructive pattern. Biopsy specimens were obtained from all lesions.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Correlation between surface pattern classification by EME and histopathologic findings of early gastric cancer.
RESULTS: Surface patterns were evident by CME/MCE in only 66.4% (166/250) of lesions but in 100% (250/250) of lesions by EME. Classification by EME was as follows: type I, 52 lesions; type II, 12; type III, 146; type IV, 32; and type V, 8. By histopathologic examination, 16 early gastric cancers were detected between type IV or V lesions. Thus, classification of types IV-V strongly correlated with the presence of gastric cancer (sensitivity 100%, specificity 89.7%).
LIMITATIONS: Single-center study.
CONCLUSIONS: Surface pattern classification by EME may be useful for identifying early gastric cancers.