Journal of behavioral addictions · 2021
Internet-based treatment of gambling problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sagoe Dominic, Griffiths Mark D, Erevik Eilin Kristine, Høyland Turid, Leino Tony, Lande Ida Alette, Sigurdsson Mie Engen, Pallesen Ståle
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The effect of internet-based psychological treatment for gambling problems has not been previously investigated by meta-analysis. The present study is therefore a quantitative synthesis of studies on the effects of internet-based treatment for gambling problems. Given that effects may vary according to the presence of therapist support and control conditions, it was presumed that subgroup analyses would elucidate such effects.
METHODS: A systematic search with no time constraints was conducted in PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Two authors independently extracted data using a predefined form, including study quality assessment based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Effect sizes were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was indexed by Cochran's Q and the I 2 statistics. Publication bias was investigated using trim and fill.
RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the analysis. Random effects models at post-treatment showed significant effects for general gambling symptoms (g = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.43-1.03), gambling frequency (g = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.14-0.45), and amount of money lost gambling (g = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.11-0.27). The corresponding findings at follow-up were g = 1.20 (95% CI = 0.79-1.61), g = 0.36 (95% CI = 0.12-0.60), and g = 0.20 (95% CI = 0.12-0.29) respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that for general gambling symptoms, studies with therapist support yield larger effects than studies without, both post-treatment and at follow-up. Additionally, on general gambling symptoms and gambling frequency, there were lower effect sizes for studies with a control group compared to studies without a control group at follow-up. Studies with higher baseline severity of gambling problems were associated with larger effect sizes at both posttreatment and follow-up than studies with more lenient inclusion criteria concerning gambling problems.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based treatment has the potential to reach a large proportion of persons with gambling problems. Results of the meta-analysis suggest that such treatments hold promise as an effective approach. Future studies are encouraged to examine moderators of treatment outcomes, validate treatment effects cross-culturally, and investigate the effects of novel developments such as ecological momentary interventions.
METHODS: A systematic search with no time constraints was conducted in PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Two authors independently extracted data using a predefined form, including study quality assessment based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Effect sizes were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was indexed by Cochran's Q and the I 2 statistics. Publication bias was investigated using trim and fill.
RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the analysis. Random effects models at post-treatment showed significant effects for general gambling symptoms (g = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.43-1.03), gambling frequency (g = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.14-0.45), and amount of money lost gambling (g = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.11-0.27). The corresponding findings at follow-up were g = 1.20 (95% CI = 0.79-1.61), g = 0.36 (95% CI = 0.12-0.60), and g = 0.20 (95% CI = 0.12-0.29) respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that for general gambling symptoms, studies with therapist support yield larger effects than studies without, both post-treatment and at follow-up. Additionally, on general gambling symptoms and gambling frequency, there were lower effect sizes for studies with a control group compared to studies without a control group at follow-up. Studies with higher baseline severity of gambling problems were associated with larger effect sizes at both posttreatment and follow-up than studies with more lenient inclusion criteria concerning gambling problems.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based treatment has the potential to reach a large proportion of persons with gambling problems. Results of the meta-analysis suggest that such treatments hold promise as an effective approach. Future studies are encouraged to examine moderators of treatment outcomes, validate treatment effects cross-culturally, and investigate the effects of novel developments such as ecological momentary interventions.