DOI 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103378
Image quality of opportunistic breast examinations in photon-counting computed tomography: A phantom study.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the breast imaging performance of a clinical whole-body photon-counting CT (PCCT) to that of a dedicated breast CT (BCT) to determine the image quality of opportunistic breast examinations in clinical PCCT.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
To quantify image quality for breast cancer applications, acquisitions of a breast phantom including representations of calcifications, fibers, and masses were performed using a clinical PCCT and a dedicated BCT. When imaging with the PCCT, the phantom was also combined with a thorax phantom to simulate realistic patient positioning, while only the breast phantom was imaged in the BCT. Images in BCT were acquired at 7.0 mGy (CTDI16cm) and using 2.6 mGy-25.0 mGy in the PCCT. Spatial resolution between the BCT and PCCT images was matched and data were reconstructed using the default methods of each system. The dose-normalized contrast-to-noise ratio (CNRD) of masses and the structural visibility of fibers and calcifications were evaluated as figures of merit for all reconstructions.
RESULTS
CNRD between masses and background was 0.56 mGy-½, on average with BCT and varied between 0.39 mGy-½ to 1.46 mGy-½ with PCCT over all dose levels, phantom configurations, and reconstruction algorithms. Calcifications down to a size of 0.29 mm and fibers down to a size of 0.23 mm could be reliably identified in the images of both systems.
CONCLUSIONS
Clinical PCCT provides an image quality superior to that obtained with BCT in terms of CNRD and allows for the identification of calcifications and fibers at comparable dose levels.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.