Current medical imaging · 2024
Occurrence of Residual Breast Tumors and Efficacy of MRI in their Detection after Vacuum-assisted Excisional Biopsy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wei Qun, Zheng Qing, Gu Yifeng, Teng Rongyue, Zhao Wenhe
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Residual breast tumors may remain after vacuum-assisted excisional biopsy (VAEB).
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of residual breast tumors in patients after VAEB and the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting these tumors.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis examined patients who received VAEB before a diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) at our hospital from 2015 to 2019. The incidence of residual tumors after VAEB was determined by MRI and pathological examination. The diagnostic value of MRI in detecting residual tumors was determined for all patients and different subgroups. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with residual tumors.
RESULTS: We examined 147 patients and obtained pathological samples from 146 patients, including 103 (70.5%) with residual tumors and 43 (29.5%) without residual tumors. The MRI examinations demonstrated the complete tumor resection rate was 48.9%. Compared to the pathological results, MRI had a positive predictive value of 77.8%, negative predictive value of 48.8%, specificity of 65.6%, and sensitivity of 60.7%. Further analysis indicated that MRI had moderate accuracies for patients with stage pT-1 (71.9%), stage pTNM-IA (73.1%), and luminal B subtype (78.3%). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of tumor residue correlated with the pathological stage.
CONCLUSION: Tumor residue is common after VAEB, and MRI has limited accuracy in detecting these residual tumors. However, for small breast tumors and luminal B subtype BC, MRI had higher accuracy in the detection of residual tumors. The risk of tumor residue is closely associated with the pathological stage.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of residual breast tumors in patients after VAEB and the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting these tumors.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis examined patients who received VAEB before a diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) at our hospital from 2015 to 2019. The incidence of residual tumors after VAEB was determined by MRI and pathological examination. The diagnostic value of MRI in detecting residual tumors was determined for all patients and different subgroups. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with residual tumors.
RESULTS: We examined 147 patients and obtained pathological samples from 146 patients, including 103 (70.5%) with residual tumors and 43 (29.5%) without residual tumors. The MRI examinations demonstrated the complete tumor resection rate was 48.9%. Compared to the pathological results, MRI had a positive predictive value of 77.8%, negative predictive value of 48.8%, specificity of 65.6%, and sensitivity of 60.7%. Further analysis indicated that MRI had moderate accuracies for patients with stage pT-1 (71.9%), stage pTNM-IA (73.1%), and luminal B subtype (78.3%). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of tumor residue correlated with the pathological stage.
CONCLUSION: Tumor residue is common after VAEB, and MRI has limited accuracy in detecting these residual tumors. However, for small breast tumors and luminal B subtype BC, MRI had higher accuracy in the detection of residual tumors. The risk of tumor residue is closely associated with the pathological stage.