Identifying Gaps in the International Consensus Case Definitions for Invasive Aspergillosis: A Review of Clinical Cases Not Meeting These Definitions.

BACKGROUND

International consensus definitions for invasive aspergillosis (IA) in research are rigorous, yet clinically significant cases are often excluded from clinical studies for not meeting proven/probable IA case definitions. To better understand reasons for the failure to meet criteria for proven/probable infection, we herein review 47 such cases for their clinical and microbiological characteristics and outcomes.

METHODS

Data on 47 cases that did not meet consensus IA definitions but were deemed significant were derived from a retrospective, observational, multicenter survey of 382 presumed IA cases across Australasia, of which findings of 221 proven/probable infections were recently published. The clinical, microbiological, and radiologic characteristics of these cases were analyzed. Mortality outcomes were compared with those of 221 proven/probable cases.

RESULTS

Of 47 cases studied, 15 lacked classical host factors; 22 exhibited only a single positive Aspergillus polymerase chain reaction result; 7 lacked typical IA radiologic findings on chest computed tomography; and 3 had borderline galactomannan optical density indices (<1.0 but ≥0.5) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. The median age of patients was 61 years (IQR, 52-68); 34 were male (72%). Seven patients (15%) required intensive care admission. All patients had lung as the primary site of infection. Antifungal treatment was initiated in 42 patients (89%). All-cause 90-day mortality was 33%, similar to the 30% mortality in the comparative cohort (n = 221).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the limitations of current consensus definitions for IA. Notably, the mortality of patients not meeting these definitions was similar to that of patients with proven/probable IA. Further studies, especially of patients with a single positive Aspergillus polymerase chain reaction result and those without host factors, are needed to determine if future consensus definitions may benefit from modifications.