Third molar position after completion of orthodontic treatment: a prospective follow-up.

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively follow up a previously reported sample, analyzing (1) changes in third molar (M3) position after completion of 2 different types of orthodontic treatment: (2) non-extraction treatment with (HG) vs without cervical headgear (non-HG) and (3) first or second premolar extractions (PM1-2) compared to a non-extraction group (NE).

METHODS

A total of 474 patients were prospectively followed up. Panoramic radiographs were taken pre- (T1), post-treatment (T2) and at follow-up (T3). T3 records (a mean of three years after treatment) were available for 135 (HG vs non-HG) and 134 patients (PM1-2 vs NE), respectively. Angulation, vertical position, relation with the mandibular canal and mineralization status of M3 at T2 and T3 were statistically compared.

RESULTS

The HG group presented more M3 with ideal vertical orientation at T3. In NE-cases, further improvement in angulation and orientation can be expected after debonding, as well as a deterioration in the relationship with the mandibular canal. Extractions accelerated upper M3 vertical eruption and PM2 extractions led to long-term larger lower retromolar spaces.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of cervical headgear increased upper M3 uprighting three years after debonding, while little changes in M3 position were found after orthodontic treatment with extractions. However, PM2 extractions led to larger retromolar spaces and better M3 angulation in the long term.