Identification and validation of diagnostic cut-offs of the ELISpot assay for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in high-risk patients.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bettelli Francesca, Vallerini Daniela, Lagreca Ivana, Barozzi Patrizia, Riva Giovanni, Nasillo Vincenzo, Paolini Ambra, D'Amico Roberto, Forghieri Fabio, Morselli Monica, Pioli Valeria, Gilioli Andrea, Giusti Davide, Messerotti Andrea, Bresciani Paola, Cuoghi Angela, Colaci Elisabetta, Marasca Roberto, Pagano Livio, Candoni Anna, Maertens Johan, Viale Pierluigi, Mussini Cristina, Manfredini Rossella, Tagliafico Enrico, Sarti Mario, Trenti Tommaso, Lewis Russell, Comoli Patrizia, Eccher Albino, Luppi Mario, Potenza Leonardo
Аннотация
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled two cohorts of patients undergoing intensive myelosuppressive or immunosuppressive treatments at high risk for IA. ELISpot was performed to detect Aspergillus-specific T cells producing Interleukin-10.
RESULTS: In the discovery cohort, a derived cut-off of 40 spot forming cells (SFCs)/106 PBMCs has shown to correctly classify IA cases with a sensitivity and specificity of 89.5% and 88.6%, respectively. This cut-off is lowered to 25 SFC when considering the subset of possible IA patients, with sensitivity and specificity of 76% and 93%, respectively. The application of the 40 SFCs cut-off to the validation cohort resulted in a positivity rate of 83.3% in proven/probable cases and a negativity rate of 92.5% in possible/non-IA cases. Adopting the 25 SCFs cut-off, the assay resulted positive in 83.3% of proven/probable cases while it resulted negative in 66.7% of possible/non-IA cases.
CONCLUSIONS: ELISpot shows promises in the diagnosis of IA and the possibility to use two distinct cut-offs with similar diagnostic performances according to patients' different pre-test probability of infection can widen its use in patients at risk.