International journal of colorectal disease · 2015
Easy clip to treat anal fistula tracts: a word of caution.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gautier M, Godeberge P, Ganansia R, Bozio G, Godart B, Bigard M A, Barthet M, Siproudhis L, Groupe de Recherche en Proctologie SNFCP France
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Closing the internal opening by a clip ovesco has been recently proposed for healing the fistula tract, but, to date, data on benefit are poorly analyzed. The aim was to report a preliminary multicenter experience.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study was undertaken in six different French centers: surgical procedure, immediate complications, and follow-up have been collected.
RESULTS: Nineteen clips were inserted in 17 patients (M/F, 4/13; median age, 42 years [29-54]) who had an anal fistula: 12 (71%) high fistulas (including 4 rectovaginal fistulas), 5 (29%) lower fistulas (with 3 rectovaginal fistulas), and 6 (35%) Crohn's fistulas. Out of 17 patients, 15 had a seton drainage beforehand. The procedure was easy in 8 (47%) patients and the median operative time was 27.5 min (20-36.5). Postoperative period was painful for 11 (65%) patients. A clip migration was noted in 11 patients (65%) after a median follow-up of 10 days (5.5-49.8). Eleven patients (65%) who failed had reoperation including 10 new drainages within the first month (0.5-5). After a mean follow-up of 4 months (2-7),, closing the tract was observed in 2 patients (12%) following the first insertion of the clip and in another one after a second insertion.
CONCLUSION: Treatment of anal fistula by placing a clip on the internal opening is disappointing and deleterious for some patients. A better assessment before dissemination is recommended.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study was undertaken in six different French centers: surgical procedure, immediate complications, and follow-up have been collected.
RESULTS: Nineteen clips were inserted in 17 patients (M/F, 4/13; median age, 42 years [29-54]) who had an anal fistula: 12 (71%) high fistulas (including 4 rectovaginal fistulas), 5 (29%) lower fistulas (with 3 rectovaginal fistulas), and 6 (35%) Crohn's fistulas. Out of 17 patients, 15 had a seton drainage beforehand. The procedure was easy in 8 (47%) patients and the median operative time was 27.5 min (20-36.5). Postoperative period was painful for 11 (65%) patients. A clip migration was noted in 11 patients (65%) after a median follow-up of 10 days (5.5-49.8). Eleven patients (65%) who failed had reoperation including 10 new drainages within the first month (0.5-5). After a mean follow-up of 4 months (2-7),, closing the tract was observed in 2 patients (12%) following the first insertion of the clip and in another one after a second insertion.
CONCLUSION: Treatment of anal fistula by placing a clip on the internal opening is disappointing and deleterious for some patients. A better assessment before dissemination is recommended.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOperative TimePatient SafetyPilot ProjectsPostoperative ComplicationsRectal FistulaRectovaginal FistulaRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSurgical InstrumentsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeWound Healing