Active surveillance versus immediate surgery: A comparison of clinical and quality of life outcomes among patients with highly suspicious thyroid nodules 1 cm or smaller in China.

INTRODUCTION

Active surveillance (AS) is considered an alternative to immediate surgery (IS) for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) patients. However, it is difficult to decide between AS and IS due to limited evidence regarding risks and benefits for patients in China.

METHODS

This study prospectively enrolled 485 patients with highly suspicious thyroid nodules </= 1 cm who chose AS and 331 patients who underwent IS during the same period. The oncological outcomes, adverse events and quality of life, were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The oncological outcomes of the IS and AS groups were similarly excellent. The IS group had significantly higher rates of temporary vocal cord paralysis (VCP) and temporary hypoparathyroidism than the AS group (2.7% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.002; 13.6% vs.1.9%, p < 0.001, respectively). The IS group had significantly more patients on hormone replacement therapy (98.4% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.001) and a significantly higher incidence of neck scarring (94.3% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001) compared to the AS group. In the early stages, the quality of life questionnaire showed significant differences with respect to three items: voice, throat/mouth, and surgical scarring, with more complaints in the IS group. However, one year or more after surgery, the main complaint was surgical scarring.

CONCLUSION

In China, AS can achieve similar short-term therapeutic effects as IS. As this approach can reduce the occurrence of unfavorable events, achieve better quality of life, it is a feasible option for patients with highly suspicious thyroid nodules.