Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2011
The anatomy of failures following the ligation of intersphincteric tract technique for anal fistula: a review of 93 patients over 4 years.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tan Ker-Kan, Tan Ian J, Lim Frances S, Koh Dean C, Tsang Charles B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although the ligation of intersphincteric tract technique is a promising sphincter-preserving option in managing anal fistulas, failures are still seen.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to illustrate the patterns of failures and recurrences following the ligation of intersphincteric tract procedure for anal fistulas.
DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review.
SETTINGS: This study was conducted at the Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, from April 2006 to September 2010.
PATIENTS: Ninety-three patients were evaluated.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent the ligation of intersphincteric tract procedure for anal fistulas.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure was defined as nonhealing of the surgical wound or fistula. Recurrence was defined as the reappearance of the fistula after initial healing.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 23 (range, 1-85) weeks, there were 7 failures and 6 recurrences. The median time to healing was 4 (range, 1-12) weeks. The freedom from failure or recurrence at 1 year following the ligation of intersphincteric tract procedure was 78% (95% CI: 66%-90%). All 7 failures had discharge at the intersphincteric wound. Four had an unhealed internal opening, and 3 had isolated failures at the intersphincteric wound. Endoanal ultrasonography revealed a less complicated anatomy that enabled successful treatment with either local application of silver nitrate (n = 3) or fistulotomy (n = 4). All 6 recurrences had a demonstrable tract from the previous internal opening to an external opening with healing of the intersphincteric wound. The median time to recurrence was 22 (range, 15-33) weeks from the ligation of the intersphincteric tract procedure. Fistulotomy, repeat ligation of intersphincteric tract, or anocutaneous advancement flap procedure was successfully performed subsequently.
CONCLUSION: In patients with early failures, the medialization of the external opening to the intersphincteric wound simplified subsequent management. All recurrences should be reevaluated and managed accordingly.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to illustrate the patterns of failures and recurrences following the ligation of intersphincteric tract procedure for anal fistulas.
DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review.
SETTINGS: This study was conducted at the Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, from April 2006 to September 2010.
PATIENTS: Ninety-three patients were evaluated.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent the ligation of intersphincteric tract procedure for anal fistulas.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure was defined as nonhealing of the surgical wound or fistula. Recurrence was defined as the reappearance of the fistula after initial healing.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 23 (range, 1-85) weeks, there were 7 failures and 6 recurrences. The median time to healing was 4 (range, 1-12) weeks. The freedom from failure or recurrence at 1 year following the ligation of intersphincteric tract procedure was 78% (95% CI: 66%-90%). All 7 failures had discharge at the intersphincteric wound. Four had an unhealed internal opening, and 3 had isolated failures at the intersphincteric wound. Endoanal ultrasonography revealed a less complicated anatomy that enabled successful treatment with either local application of silver nitrate (n = 3) or fistulotomy (n = 4). All 6 recurrences had a demonstrable tract from the previous internal opening to an external opening with healing of the intersphincteric wound. The median time to recurrence was 22 (range, 15-33) weeks from the ligation of the intersphincteric tract procedure. Fistulotomy, repeat ligation of intersphincteric tract, or anocutaneous advancement flap procedure was successfully performed subsequently.
CONCLUSION: In patients with early failures, the medialization of the external opening to the intersphincteric wound simplified subsequent management. All recurrences should be reevaluated and managed accordingly.