Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2021
Comparing outcomes of diabetic ketoacidosis hospitalisations in patients with diastolic heart failure: A retrospective propensity matched analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shaka Hafeez, El-Amir Zain, Aljadah Michael, Wani Farah, Velazquez Genero, Kichloo Asim
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a known complication of patients with diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients admitted with a diagnosis of DKA with, and without, diastolic heart failure (DHF).
METHODS: This was a population-based, retrospective, observational study using data from the National Inpatient Sample database for the years 2016 and 2017. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were rates of sepsis, non-ST elevation myocardial infarctions (NSTEMI), acute kidney failure, acute respiratory failure (ARF), deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, mean length of hospital stay (LOS) and total hospital charges (THC).
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference for the adjusted odds for in-hospital mortality between patients with and without DHF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-1.08, p = 0.081). Patients with DKA and DHF had increased odds of developing an NSTEMI (aOR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.70, p = 0.045) or ARF (aOR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.38-2.40, p < 0.001) during the same admission compared to patients without DHF. Patients with DKA and DHF also had an increased mean THC (6500 CI: 1900-11,200, p = 0.0006) in US dollars and increased LOS (0.7, 95% CI: 0.2-1.3, p = 0.011) in days when compared to patients without DHF.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DKA showed no statistically significant difference in mortality if they did or did not have a secondary diagnosis of DHF within the same admission.
METHODS: This was a population-based, retrospective, observational study using data from the National Inpatient Sample database for the years 2016 and 2017. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were rates of sepsis, non-ST elevation myocardial infarctions (NSTEMI), acute kidney failure, acute respiratory failure (ARF), deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, mean length of hospital stay (LOS) and total hospital charges (THC).
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference for the adjusted odds for in-hospital mortality between patients with and without DHF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-1.08, p = 0.081). Patients with DKA and DHF had increased odds of developing an NSTEMI (aOR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.70, p = 0.045) or ARF (aOR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.38-2.40, p < 0.001) during the same admission compared to patients without DHF. Patients with DKA and DHF also had an increased mean THC (6500 CI: 1900-11,200, p = 0.0006) in US dollars and increased LOS (0.7, 95% CI: 0.2-1.3, p = 0.011) in days when compared to patients without DHF.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DKA showed no statistically significant difference in mortality if they did or did not have a secondary diagnosis of DHF within the same admission.