MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.04.002

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2016

The Effectiveness of Pitch-raising Surgery in Male-to-Female Transsexuals: A Systematic Review.

Van Damme Silke, Cosyns Marjan, Deman Sofie, Van den Eede Zoë, Van Borsel John

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to review the evidence of the effectiveness of pitch-raising surgery performed in male-to-female transsexuals.

METHODS

A search for studies was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, and the references in retrieved manuscripts, using as keywords "transsexual" or "transgender" combined with terms related to voice surgery. We included eight studies using cricothyroid approximation, six studies using anterior glottal web formation, and six studies using other surgery types or a combination of surgical techniques, leading to 20 studies in total.

RESULTS

Objectively, a substantial rise in postoperative fundamental frequency was identified. Perceptually, mainly laryngeal web formation seems risky for decreasing voice quality. The majority of patients seemed satisfied with the outcome. However, none of the studies used a control group and randomization process. Further investigation regarding long-term results is necessary.

CONCLUSION

Future research needs to investigate long-term effects of pitch-raising surgery using a stronger study design.

Для цитирования: Van Damme Silke, Cosyns Marjan, Deman Sofie, Van den Eede Zoë, Van Borsel John. The Effectiveness of Pitch-raising Surgery in Male-to-Female Transsexuals: A Systematic Review.. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.04.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.