Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2016
EVIDENCE-BASED CURRICULAR CONTENT IMPROVES STUDENT KNOWLEDGE AND CHANGES ATTITUDES TOWARDS TRANSGENDER MEDICINE.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eriksson Sven E S, Safer Joshua D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have demonstrated that the addition of transgender medicine content to a medical school curriculum increased students' comfort and willingness to treat transgender patients. We aimed to demonstrate that (1) evidence-based curricular content would improve knowledge of and change attitudes towards transgender medicine, and (2) students would consider cross-sex hormone therapy a legitimate treatment option for transgender patients.
METHODS: Curricular content with a focus on the biologic evidence for the durability of gender identity was added to the first-year medical program at Boston University School of Medicine. Immediately before and after exposure to the content, students were presented with an assessment of their knowledge of the etiology of gender identity.
RESULTS: Immediately following exposure to the content, a significant number of students changed their answer regarding the etiology of gender identity so that the number of correct responses increased from 63% (n = 56) to 93% (n = 121) (P<.001). For transgender treatment, the number of correct responses increased from 20% (n = 56) before exposure to the content to 50% (n = 121) following exposure (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: The addition of transgender medicine content to a medical school curriculum with a focus on the biologic evidence for a durable gender identity is an effective means of educating students about the etiology of gender identity and the appropriateness of cross-sex hormone therapy as a treatment for transgender patients.
METHODS: Curricular content with a focus on the biologic evidence for the durability of gender identity was added to the first-year medical program at Boston University School of Medicine. Immediately before and after exposure to the content, students were presented with an assessment of their knowledge of the etiology of gender identity.
RESULTS: Immediately following exposure to the content, a significant number of students changed their answer regarding the etiology of gender identity so that the number of correct responses increased from 63% (n = 56) to 93% (n = 121) (P<.001). For transgender treatment, the number of correct responses increased from 20% (n = 56) before exposure to the content to 50% (n = 121) following exposure (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: The addition of transgender medicine content to a medical school curriculum with a focus on the biologic evidence for a durable gender identity is an effective means of educating students about the etiology of gender identity and the appropriateness of cross-sex hormone therapy as a treatment for transgender patients.