Journal of global antimicrobial resistance · 2023
Evaluation of ceftolozane-tazobactam susceptibility on a French nationwide collection of Enterobacterales.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jousset Agnès B, Bernabeu Sandrine, Emeraud Cécile, Bonnin Rémy A, Lomont Alexandra, Zahar Jean Ralph, Merens Audrey, Isnard Christophe, Soismier Nathalie, Farfour Eric, Fihman Vincent, Yin Nicolas, Barraud Olivier, Jacquier Hervé, Ranc Anne-Gaëlle, Laurent Frédéric, Corvec Stéphane, d'Epenoux Louise Ruffier, Bille Emmanuelle, Degand Nicolas, Plouzeau Chloé, Guillard Thomas, Cattoir Vincent, Mizrahi Asaf, Grillon Antoine, Janvier Frédéric, Brun Cécile Le, Amara Marlène, Bastide Mathilda, Lemonnier Alban, Dortet Laurent, GMC-study Group
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) proved its efficacy for the treatment of infections caused by non-carbapenemase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. Here, we aimed to provide susceptibility data on a large series of Enterobacterales since the revision of EUCAST categorization breakpoints in 2020.
METHODS: First, C/T susceptibility was determined on characterized Enterobacterales resistant to third generation cephalosporins (3GCs) (extended spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL] production or different levels of AmpC overexpression) (n = 213) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) (n = 259), including 170 carbapenemase producers (CPE). Then, 1632 consecutive clinical Enterobacterales responsible for infection were prospectively collected in 23 French hospitals. C/T susceptibility was determined by E-test® (biomérieux) and broth microdilution (BMD) (Sensititre™, Thermo Scientific) to perform method comparison.
RESULTS: Within the collection isolates, 88% of 3GC resistant strains were susceptible to C/T, with important variation depending on the resistance mechanism: 93% vs. 13% susceptibility for CTX-M and SHV-ESBL producers, respectively. Only 20% of the CRE were susceptible to C/T. Among CPE, 80% of OXA-48-like producers were susceptible to C/T, whereas all metallo-β-lactamase producers were resistant. The prospective study revealed that 95.6% of clinical isolates were susceptible to C/T. Method comparison performed on these 1632 clinical isolates demonstrated 99% of categorization agreement between MIC to C/T determined by E-test® in comparison with the BMD (reference) and only 74% of essential agreement.
CONCLUSION: Overall, C/T showed good activity against wild-type Enterobacterales, AmpC producers, and ESBL-producing Escherichia coli but is less active against ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, and CRE. E-test® led to an underestimation of the MICs in comparison to the BMD reference.
METHODS: First, C/T susceptibility was determined on characterized Enterobacterales resistant to third generation cephalosporins (3GCs) (extended spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL] production or different levels of AmpC overexpression) (n = 213) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) (n = 259), including 170 carbapenemase producers (CPE). Then, 1632 consecutive clinical Enterobacterales responsible for infection were prospectively collected in 23 French hospitals. C/T susceptibility was determined by E-test® (biomérieux) and broth microdilution (BMD) (Sensititre™, Thermo Scientific) to perform method comparison.
RESULTS: Within the collection isolates, 88% of 3GC resistant strains were susceptible to C/T, with important variation depending on the resistance mechanism: 93% vs. 13% susceptibility for CTX-M and SHV-ESBL producers, respectively. Only 20% of the CRE were susceptible to C/T. Among CPE, 80% of OXA-48-like producers were susceptible to C/T, whereas all metallo-β-lactamase producers were resistant. The prospective study revealed that 95.6% of clinical isolates were susceptible to C/T. Method comparison performed on these 1632 clinical isolates demonstrated 99% of categorization agreement between MIC to C/T determined by E-test® in comparison with the BMD (reference) and only 74% of essential agreement.
CONCLUSION: Overall, C/T showed good activity against wild-type Enterobacterales, AmpC producers, and ESBL-producing Escherichia coli but is less active against ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, and CRE. E-test® led to an underestimation of the MICs in comparison to the BMD reference.