Diabetologia · 2025
Recognising, quantifying and accounting for classification uncertainty in type 2 diabetes subtypes.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mori Tim, Zaharia Oana P, Straßburger Klaus, Dennis John M, Mai Knut, Kabisch Stefan, Bornstein Stefan, Szendroedi Julia, Blüher Matthias, Meyhöfer Svenja, Seissler Jochen, Birkenfeld Andreas, Stefan Norbert, Roden Michael, Wagner Robert, Kuß Oliver, and the GDS Group
Аннотация
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Despite continued interest in precision diagnostics and type 2 diabetes subtypes, the challenge of uncertainty in the classification of individuals into subtypes remains. This study introduces a novel method for quantifying and accounting for classification uncertainty in type 2 diabetes subtypes.
METHODS: Building on recommendations from the ADA/EASD Precision Medicine in Diabetes Initiative, we quantified classification uncertainty using the normalised relative entropy (NRE), computed from distances to cluster centroids. A lower NRE value indicates greater uncertainty in an individual's cluster assignment. We examined the NRE in a cohort of 859 individuals with recent-onset type 2 diabetes from the prospective, observational German Diabetes Study (GDS) and compared it across previously identified diabetes subtypes, defined by age, BMI, HbA1c, HOMA-IR and HOMA-B. Predicted 10 year CVD risk (SCORE2-Diabetes) of the subtypes was evaluated with and without accounting for classification uncertainty.
RESULTS: Individuals with mild age-related diabetes (n=395) and mild obesity-related diabetes (n=316) had a median NRE of 0.155 (95% CI 0.142, 0.177) and 0.119 (95% CI 0.107, 0.131), respectively. By contrast, individuals with severe insulin-resistant diabetes (n=130) and severe insulin-deficient diabetes (n=18) had a lower median NRE of 0.086 (95% CI 0.075, 0.108) and 0.082 (95% CI 0.071, 0.109), respectively. After weighting individuals by classification certainty, the proportion of variation in SCORE2-Diabetes explained by the subtypes (R2) increased from 17.4% (95% CI 12.8, 23.0) to 31.5% (95% CI 26.4, 37.1). The predicted 10 year CVD risk of the mild age-related diabetes subtype increased from 10.3% (95% CI 9.8, 10.7) to 11.6% (95% CI 11.2, 12.0).
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The NRE provides a means to quantify and compare individual classification uncertainty in type 2 diabetes subtypes. Classification uncertainty varied between subtypes and individuals with type 2 diabetes, and accounting for it improved the ability of the subtypes to predict 10 year CVD risk.
METHODS: Building on recommendations from the ADA/EASD Precision Medicine in Diabetes Initiative, we quantified classification uncertainty using the normalised relative entropy (NRE), computed from distances to cluster centroids. A lower NRE value indicates greater uncertainty in an individual's cluster assignment. We examined the NRE in a cohort of 859 individuals with recent-onset type 2 diabetes from the prospective, observational German Diabetes Study (GDS) and compared it across previously identified diabetes subtypes, defined by age, BMI, HbA1c, HOMA-IR and HOMA-B. Predicted 10 year CVD risk (SCORE2-Diabetes) of the subtypes was evaluated with and without accounting for classification uncertainty.
RESULTS: Individuals with mild age-related diabetes (n=395) and mild obesity-related diabetes (n=316) had a median NRE of 0.155 (95% CI 0.142, 0.177) and 0.119 (95% CI 0.107, 0.131), respectively. By contrast, individuals with severe insulin-resistant diabetes (n=130) and severe insulin-deficient diabetes (n=18) had a lower median NRE of 0.086 (95% CI 0.075, 0.108) and 0.082 (95% CI 0.071, 0.109), respectively. After weighting individuals by classification certainty, the proportion of variation in SCORE2-Diabetes explained by the subtypes (R2) increased from 17.4% (95% CI 12.8, 23.0) to 31.5% (95% CI 26.4, 37.1). The predicted 10 year CVD risk of the mild age-related diabetes subtype increased from 10.3% (95% CI 9.8, 10.7) to 11.6% (95% CI 11.2, 12.0).
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The NRE provides a means to quantify and compare individual classification uncertainty in type 2 diabetes subtypes. Classification uncertainty varied between subtypes and individuals with type 2 diabetes, and accounting for it improved the ability of the subtypes to predict 10 year CVD risk.