Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
Comparison of widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography and ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography in the detection of non-perfusion areas in diabetic retinopathy.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guo Chuyun, Xiao Ning, Li Fang, Han Yue, Chen Li, Chen Hongzhuang, Shen Yadan, Ning Xinru, Ling Ruolan, Wang Xi, Zhang Lin, Wang You, Zhong Jie, Li Jie
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the detection of non-perfusion areas (NPAs) in diabetic retinopathy (DR) using 24×20 mm widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) and ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFA), and to explore NPA distribution patterns.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 64 eyes from 48 DR patients who underwent 24×20 mm SS-OCTA and UWFA examinations. NPAs were manually annotated, and the detection rates and distribution patterns across retinal quadrants were analyzed and compared between the two imaging modalities.
RESULTS: Compared to UWFA, the 24×20 mm SS-OCTA scan range missed 53.40% of total NPAs. The detection rates within the SS-OCTA scan range varied across quadrants: 50.58% (superior temporal), 55.33% (inferior temporal), 43.99% (superior nasal), and 43.45% (inferior nasal). NPAs were most prevalent in the inferior nasal region (40.16% of total NPAs). The ischemic index (ISI) derived independently from NPAs identified by the two imaging modalities showed a very strong positive correlation.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the scan range of 24×20 mm SS-OCTA, over 50% of total NPAs were missed compared to UWFA. However, OCTA can accurately reveal the degree of retinal ischemia within its field of view. NPA is unevenly distributed in the retina, with the predominant area being the inferior nasal region. This study suggests that this area should be prioritized for assessment in DR management.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 64 eyes from 48 DR patients who underwent 24×20 mm SS-OCTA and UWFA examinations. NPAs were manually annotated, and the detection rates and distribution patterns across retinal quadrants were analyzed and compared between the two imaging modalities.
RESULTS: Compared to UWFA, the 24×20 mm SS-OCTA scan range missed 53.40% of total NPAs. The detection rates within the SS-OCTA scan range varied across quadrants: 50.58% (superior temporal), 55.33% (inferior temporal), 43.99% (superior nasal), and 43.45% (inferior nasal). NPAs were most prevalent in the inferior nasal region (40.16% of total NPAs). The ischemic index (ISI) derived independently from NPAs identified by the two imaging modalities showed a very strong positive correlation.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the scan range of 24×20 mm SS-OCTA, over 50% of total NPAs were missed compared to UWFA. However, OCTA can accurately reveal the degree of retinal ischemia within its field of view. NPA is unevenly distributed in the retina, with the predominant area being the inferior nasal region. This study suggests that this area should be prioritized for assessment in DR management.