International urology and nephrology · 2022
Comparison of estimated glomerular filtration rate equations based on serum creatinine-, cystatin C- and creatinine-cystatin C in elderly Chinese patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xia Fangxiao, Hao Wenke, Liang Jinxiu, Zhao Zhi, Wu Yanhua, Yu Feng, Hu Wenxue, Fang Xiaowu, Liu Wei
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to further evaluate the accuracy of eleven GFR equations in different subgroups of an elderly Chinese hospitalized population.
METHODS: All participants of the study were divided into seven separate groups including age-subgroup, sex-subgroup, GFR Staging-subgroup and whether combined with diabetic, hypertensive, coronary heart disease (CHD) and cerebrovascular disease. Referring to Tc-99m-DTPA dual plasma sample clearance method, six serum creatinine (Cr)-based [Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPICr), Lund-Malmö Revised (LMR), Berlin Initiative Study (BIS1), Full Age Spectrum (FASCr) and European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC)], two serum cystatin C(Cys)-based (CKD-EPICys and FASCys), and three Cr-Cys combination based (CKD-EPICr-Cys, BIS2 and FASCr-Cys) equations were employed. Bias, interquartile range of the median difference (IQR), P30, and GFR misclassification rate were calculated to compare the performance of the selected equations.
RESULTS: A total of 359 elderly Chinese patients were enrolled. Overall, median mGFR was 36.91(25.26,56.32)ml/min/1.73 m2. Smaller biases (ml/min/1.73 m2) were shown in CKD-EPICr and BIS1 equations (0.75 and 0.61). IQR (ml/min/1.73m2) was least with BIS2 equation and FASCr-Cys equation (10.34 and 10.65). For accuracy (P30), performance of FASCr-Cys, BIS2, and BIS1 equation was superior (78.3%, 78.0%, and 74.7%, respectively). In terms of RMSE (ml/min/1.73 m2), BIS1 and FASCr-Cys equation performed better (12.44 and 12.51).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study showed that the eGFR equations were less accurate in the diabetic and non-hypertension group than in the non-diabetic and hypertension group, respectively. Among all enrolled equations, the BIS2 and FASCr-Cys equations might be the best choice to evaluate glomerular filtration rate in Chinese elderly patients.
METHODS: All participants of the study were divided into seven separate groups including age-subgroup, sex-subgroup, GFR Staging-subgroup and whether combined with diabetic, hypertensive, coronary heart disease (CHD) and cerebrovascular disease. Referring to Tc-99m-DTPA dual plasma sample clearance method, six serum creatinine (Cr)-based [Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPICr), Lund-Malmö Revised (LMR), Berlin Initiative Study (BIS1), Full Age Spectrum (FASCr) and European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC)], two serum cystatin C(Cys)-based (CKD-EPICys and FASCys), and three Cr-Cys combination based (CKD-EPICr-Cys, BIS2 and FASCr-Cys) equations were employed. Bias, interquartile range of the median difference (IQR), P30, and GFR misclassification rate were calculated to compare the performance of the selected equations.
RESULTS: A total of 359 elderly Chinese patients were enrolled. Overall, median mGFR was 36.91(25.26,56.32)ml/min/1.73 m2. Smaller biases (ml/min/1.73 m2) were shown in CKD-EPICr and BIS1 equations (0.75 and 0.61). IQR (ml/min/1.73m2) was least with BIS2 equation and FASCr-Cys equation (10.34 and 10.65). For accuracy (P30), performance of FASCr-Cys, BIS2, and BIS1 equation was superior (78.3%, 78.0%, and 74.7%, respectively). In terms of RMSE (ml/min/1.73 m2), BIS1 and FASCr-Cys equation performed better (12.44 and 12.51).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study showed that the eGFR equations were less accurate in the diabetic and non-hypertension group than in the non-diabetic and hypertension group, respectively. Among all enrolled equations, the BIS2 and FASCr-Cys equations might be the best choice to evaluate glomerular filtration rate in Chinese elderly patients.