International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025
A U-shaped relationship between body mass index and the risk of elevated liver stiffness in older people: evidence from the 5-year retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lv Liang, Long Lu, Zheng Yue, Yang Nan, Xiao Jinyu, Ma Tianpei, Chen Xin, Dui Xinyang, Liu Xiaoxue, Zhang Tao, Zhou Huan, Liao Juan, Li Jiayuan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and liver stiffness in older people remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between BMI and the risk of elevated liver stiffness in older people.
METHODS: 2736 participants from the West China Health and Aging Cohort Study (WCHAC) were included in the present study. Liver stiffness was assessed using transient elastography (TE). The association of the 5-year average BMI level with elevated liver stiffness risk was estimated using multinomial logistic regression. The group-based trajectory model (GBTM) was applied to identify BMI trajectories. Additionally, restricted cubic spline analysis was conducted to explore the dose-response association between BMI and the risk of elevated liver stiffness.
RESULTS: Participants in the second BMI quartile (21.93-23.58) had the lowest prevalence of elevated liver stiffness, and then the risk increased with higher BMI quartiles (BMI Q4 vs. Q2, OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.37-3.11 and Q5 vs. Q2, OR = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.78-4.39). There were five BMI trajectories over the five-year period: low-normal-weight stable (7.42%), moderate-normal-weight stable (29.10%), low-level-overweight stable (36.22%), high-level-overweight stable (20.32%) and stable obesity (6.94%). Participants in the moderate-normal-weight stable group had the lowest prevalence of elevated liver stiffness. Compared with this group, the adjusted ORs (95% CI) elevated liver stiffness prevalence were 2.02 (1.39-2.97) for the high-level-overweight stable, and 2.83 (1.72-4.64) for the group of people with stable obesity. Dose-response analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship between BMI and elevated liver stiffness risk, suggesting an optimal BMI range of 21.8-24.3 kg/m² for older people to minimize elevated liver stiffness risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study elucidated the U-shaped relationship between BMI and the risk of elevated liver stiffness as measured by TE, and the optimal BMI range from 21.8 to 24.3 kg/m2 for the lowest risk of elevated liver stiffness in older people.
METHODS: 2736 participants from the West China Health and Aging Cohort Study (WCHAC) were included in the present study. Liver stiffness was assessed using transient elastography (TE). The association of the 5-year average BMI level with elevated liver stiffness risk was estimated using multinomial logistic regression. The group-based trajectory model (GBTM) was applied to identify BMI trajectories. Additionally, restricted cubic spline analysis was conducted to explore the dose-response association between BMI and the risk of elevated liver stiffness.
RESULTS: Participants in the second BMI quartile (21.93-23.58) had the lowest prevalence of elevated liver stiffness, and then the risk increased with higher BMI quartiles (BMI Q4 vs. Q2, OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.37-3.11 and Q5 vs. Q2, OR = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.78-4.39). There were five BMI trajectories over the five-year period: low-normal-weight stable (7.42%), moderate-normal-weight stable (29.10%), low-level-overweight stable (36.22%), high-level-overweight stable (20.32%) and stable obesity (6.94%). Participants in the moderate-normal-weight stable group had the lowest prevalence of elevated liver stiffness. Compared with this group, the adjusted ORs (95% CI) elevated liver stiffness prevalence were 2.02 (1.39-2.97) for the high-level-overweight stable, and 2.83 (1.72-4.64) for the group of people with stable obesity. Dose-response analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship between BMI and elevated liver stiffness risk, suggesting an optimal BMI range of 21.8-24.3 kg/m² for older people to minimize elevated liver stiffness risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study elucidated the U-shaped relationship between BMI and the risk of elevated liver stiffness as measured by TE, and the optimal BMI range from 21.8 to 24.3 kg/m2 for the lowest risk of elevated liver stiffness in older people.