MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mjd.2003.63

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2003

Acral lentiginous melanoma mimicking benign disease: the Emory experience.

Soon Seaver L, Solomon Alvin R, Papadopoulos Diamondis, Murray Douglas R, McAlpine Barbara, Washington Carl V

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Plantar and subungual melanoma exhibits a higher misdiagnosis rate relative to other anatomic sites. Misdiagnosis and delay in diagnosis are statistically associated with poorer patient outcome. Awareness of atypical presentations of acral melanoma may, thus, be important to decrease misdiagnosis rates and improve patient outcome.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case review of plantar or lower-extremity subungual melanoma performed at Winship Cancer Center, a tertiary care, referral center affiliated with Emory University, between 1985 and 2001.

RESULTS

A total of 53 cases of plantar or lower-extremity subungual melanoma were identified. Of 53 cases with a final diagnosis of melanoma, 18 were initially misdiagnosed. Misdiagnoses included wart, callous, fungal disorder, foreign body, crusty lesion, sweat gland condition, blister, nonhealing wound, mole, keratoacanthoma, subungual hematoma, onychomycosis, ingrown toenail, and defective/infected toenail. Of the 18 misdiagnosed cases, 9 were clinically amelanotic.

CONCLUSION

Awareness that amelanotic variants of acral melanoma may assume the morphology of benign hyperkeratotic dermatoses may increase the rate of correct diagnosis and improve patient outcome.

Для цитирования: Soon Seaver L, Solomon Alvin R, Papadopoulos Diamondis, Murray Douglas R, McAlpine Barbara, Washington Carl V. Acral lentiginous melanoma mimicking benign disease: the Emory experience.. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2003. DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2003.63.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.