American journal of surgery · 2023
Tricks of the trade: Techniques for preoperative localization in reoperative parathyroidectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Amjad Wajid, Trerotola Scott O, Fraker Douglas L, Wachtel Heather
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Reoperative parathyroidectomy for recurrent/persistent primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) has high rates of failure. The goal of this study was to analyze our experience with imaging and parathyroid vein sampling (PAVS) for recurrent/persistent PHPT.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study (2002-2018) of patients with recurrent/persistent PHPT undergoing reoperative parathyroidectomy.
RESULTS: Among 181 patients, the most common imaging study was sestamibi (89.5%), followed by ultrasound (75.7%). CT had the highest rate of localization (70.8%) compared to sestamibi (58.0%) and ultrasound (47.4%). PAVS was performed in 25 patients, and localized in 96%. Ultrasound and sestamibi both demonstrated 62% PPV for operative pathology, compared to 41% in CT. PAVS was 95% sensitive with 95% PPV for predicting the correct side of abnormal parathyroid tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend a sequential imaging evaluation for reoperative parathyroidectomy, with sestamibi and/or ultrasound followed by CT. PAVS should be considered if non-invasive imaging fails to localize.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study (2002-2018) of patients with recurrent/persistent PHPT undergoing reoperative parathyroidectomy.
RESULTS: Among 181 patients, the most common imaging study was sestamibi (89.5%), followed by ultrasound (75.7%). CT had the highest rate of localization (70.8%) compared to sestamibi (58.0%) and ultrasound (47.4%). PAVS was performed in 25 patients, and localized in 96%. Ultrasound and sestamibi both demonstrated 62% PPV for operative pathology, compared to 41% in CT. PAVS was 95% sensitive with 95% PPV for predicting the correct side of abnormal parathyroid tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend a sequential imaging evaluation for reoperative parathyroidectomy, with sestamibi and/or ultrasound followed by CT. PAVS should be considered if non-invasive imaging fails to localize.