Prevalence and Etiological Profile of Hypercalcemia in Hospitalized Adult Patients and Association with Mortality.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The etiology of hypercalcemia varies according to the clinical setting. Hitherto, data on the prevalence and profile of hypercalcemia in hospitalized Asian-Indian patients are limited. Hence, we conducted a prospective observational study to determine the prevalence and etiological profile of hypercalcemia in hospitalized Asian-Indian patients and its association with 6-month mortality.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
We conducted a prospective observational study wherein all the patients (aged >12 years) admitted to the general medicine wards of a tertiary care hospital in North India between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017, were screened. Finally, patients with sustained hypercalcemia (defined as corrected serum total calcium ≥10.4 mg/dl documented twice at least 24 h apart) were included in this study. These patients were followed up throughout the hospital course and thereafter till 6 months from the date of discharge.
RESULTS
Out of 9902 patients, 150 patients had sustained hypercalcemia (prevalence 1.5%). The most common cause of hypercalcemia was malignancy (41.3%), followed by primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT, 32.7%). Vitamin D intoxication was responsible for hypercalcemia in 8.7% of patients; 2.7% of patients had hypercalcemia of advanced chronic liver disease. Nevertheless, a definite etiology could not be identified in 7.3% of the patients with hypercalcemia. At the end of 6 months of follow-up, the cumulative mortality rate was 28%. Underlying malignancy and higher calcium levels were the significant determinants of mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
The prevalence of hypercalcemia in Asian-Indian patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital was 1.5%. The most common etiology was malignancy, followed by PHPT.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.