DOI 10.1097/prs.0000000000009658
Surgical Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Two-Center Retrospective Study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic inflammatory condition that presents a challenging reconstructive problem for plastic surgeons.
METHODS
The authors performed a retrospective chart review of hidradenitis suppurativa patients managed with surgical excision between 2005 and 2020 at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Tulane University Medical Center. Operative cases associated with the same hospitalization were organized into treatment episodes and assessed for patient demographics, operative techniques, and outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 181 patients, 435 cases and 316 treatment episodes (Brigham and Women's Hospital, n = 269; Tulane University Medical Center, n = 47), were identified across two diverse institutions. Their respective series showed comparable patient demographics, and 94 percent of the combined episodes achieved wound closure and healing during the study period. Several techniques of closure were identified, including immediate closure and site-specific methods, such as an expedited staged closure using internal negative-pressure wound therapy as a temporary bridge, "recycled" skin grafting, and repurposing iodoform wicks as an adjunct wound healing therapy to immediate closure.
CONCLUSIONS
This large multi-institutional retrospective chart review on the plastic surgical management of hidradenitis suppurativa demonstrates that surgery is an effective therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa and captures a diversity of site-specific techniques that may serve as a foundation for future prospective studies and evidence-based guidelines for the use of various techniques to optimize patients' surgical outcomes.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.