Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2005
Clinical research, comparison of the subjective visual function in patients with epiphora and patients with second-eye cataract.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kafil-Hussain Namir, Khooshebah Ramona
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess the subjective visual disability of patients with epiphora and to compare the results with that of patients waiting for second eye cataract surgery.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomised, questionnaire-based study.
METHODS: Forty-six patients with epiphora listed for dacryocystorhinostomy and 50 patients having second eye cataract extraction were enrolled. A questionnaire focusing on functional visual disability in daily life and based on VF-14 was completed for each participant.
RESULTS: Eighty-six percent of patients with epiphora and 41% of second-eye cataracts had difficulty reading small print (P < 0.05). The extent of such difficulty was moderate to great in 48% of epiphora and only 26% of cataract patients .A substantial percentage of epiphora patients and second eye cataract also reported difficulty with other tasks, such as doing fine work (78.9% vs. 42%) (P < 0.05), watching television (63.1% vs. 19%) (P < 0.05), seeing steps or stairs (43.4% vs. 10%) (P < 0.05), or reading signs (39.1% vs. 4%) (P < 0.05), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There is widespread recognition of the effect of cataract on visual function. This has resulted in substantial government funding to improve access to cataract surgery. In comparison, epiphora is rarely considered as a significant cause of visual disability. This study suggests that patients with epiphora suffer the same if not more of a visual handicap than patients awaiting second eye cataract surgery.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomised, questionnaire-based study.
METHODS: Forty-six patients with epiphora listed for dacryocystorhinostomy and 50 patients having second eye cataract extraction were enrolled. A questionnaire focusing on functional visual disability in daily life and based on VF-14 was completed for each participant.
RESULTS: Eighty-six percent of patients with epiphora and 41% of second-eye cataracts had difficulty reading small print (P < 0.05). The extent of such difficulty was moderate to great in 48% of epiphora and only 26% of cataract patients .A substantial percentage of epiphora patients and second eye cataract also reported difficulty with other tasks, such as doing fine work (78.9% vs. 42%) (P < 0.05), watching television (63.1% vs. 19%) (P < 0.05), seeing steps or stairs (43.4% vs. 10%) (P < 0.05), or reading signs (39.1% vs. 4%) (P < 0.05), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There is widespread recognition of the effect of cataract on visual function. This has resulted in substantial government funding to improve access to cataract surgery. In comparison, epiphora is rarely considered as a significant cause of visual disability. This study suggests that patients with epiphora suffer the same if not more of a visual handicap than patients awaiting second eye cataract surgery.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCataractCataract ExtractionCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularMaleMiddle AgedProbabilityProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeVision TestsVisual AcuityWaiting Lists