MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/1471-2415-5-2

Медицинская библиотека · BMC ophthalmology · 2005

Clinical outcome of endonasal KTP laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy.

Ressiniotis Thomas, Voros Gerasimos M, Kostakis Vasilios T, Carrie Sean, Neoh Christopher

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the clinical outcome of primary endonasal laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy (ENL-DCR) using the potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all primary ENL-DCRs performed within a period of twelve months by the same combined Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaringology team in Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. The main outcome measure for success was resolution or significant improvement of epiphora. Details of surgery, intraoperative and postoperative complications, as well as pathology associated with failure were also studied. Patients were followed up for at least 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 41 consecutive ENL-DCRs on 29 patients (22 females, 7 males, mean age 75 years) were analysed. All patients had bicanalicular silicone intubation for at least 4 months. The success rate at 12 months postoperatively was 78.1%. Pathology associated with failure included: intranasal pathology (12.2%), mucocele (7.3%), and systemic sarcoidosis (2.4%). No significant intra-operative complications were recorded.

CONCLUSION

The ENL-DCR with potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser can be considered as a safe and efficient primary procedure for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Для цитирования: Ressiniotis Thomas, Voros Gerasimos M, Kostakis Vasilios T, Carrie Sean, Neoh Christopher. Clinical outcome of endonasal KTP laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy.. BMC ophthalmology. 2005. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2415-5-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.