International journal of cardiology · 2026
Machine learning applied to echocardiographic deformation curves for prediction of heart failure and cardiovascular death.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Simonsen Jakob Øystein, Højlund Rune, Modin Daniel, Skaarup Kristoffer Grundtvig, Olsen Flemming Javier, Christensen Jacob, Lassen Mats Christian Højbjerg, Johansen Niklas Dyrby, Sánchez-Martínez Sergio, Claggett Brian Lee, Marott Jacob Louis, Jensen Magnus T, Jensen Gorm B, Schnohr Peter, Møgelvang Rasmus, Diederichsen Søren Zöga, Xing Lucas Yixi, Køber Lars, Svendsen Jesper Hastrup, Rasmussen Simon, Clemmensen Line Katrine Harder, Tfelt-Hansen Jacob, Biering-Sørensen Tor
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Many patterns from the entire strain and TDI curves remain uninvestigated.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether applying signal analysis with supervised machine learning (ML) to strain and TDI curves would improve the prediction of heart failure (HF) or cardiovascular death (CV death) compared with conventional echocardiographic parameters, and whether it would reveal previously unrecognized prognostic signal-derived parameters.
METHODS: In total, 744 novel signal-analytical parameters extracted from 18 strain curves and 6 TDI curves were evaluated using ML and compared with a baseline ML model trained on 17 conventional echocardiographic parameters. The primary endpoint was a combined endpoint of incident HF or CV death within five years.
RESULTS: The analysis included 2589 subjects from the Copenhagen City Heart Study (CCHS) for training the ML model and 916 subjects from the LOOP Study for external testing. In total, 126 subjects (4.9%) met the primary endpoint in CCHS, whereas 59 subjects (6.4%) met the primary endpoint in the LOOP Study. The models incorporating signal analysis, both stand-alone and combined with conventional parameters, significantly increased discrimination compared to the baseline model based on conventional parameters in the external test cohort (Baseline model: AUC 0.721, CI 0.639:0.802 vs. signal analytical model: AUC 0.790, CI 0.730:0.850, p = 0.031 and combined model: AUC 0.788, CI 0.727:0.849, p = 0.021).
CONCLUSION: A ML model based on signal analysis of strain and TDI curves from echocardiographic examinations modestly improved 5-year discrimination for incident HF or CV death compared to a model based on conventional echocardiographic parameters.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether applying signal analysis with supervised machine learning (ML) to strain and TDI curves would improve the prediction of heart failure (HF) or cardiovascular death (CV death) compared with conventional echocardiographic parameters, and whether it would reveal previously unrecognized prognostic signal-derived parameters.
METHODS: In total, 744 novel signal-analytical parameters extracted from 18 strain curves and 6 TDI curves were evaluated using ML and compared with a baseline ML model trained on 17 conventional echocardiographic parameters. The primary endpoint was a combined endpoint of incident HF or CV death within five years.
RESULTS: The analysis included 2589 subjects from the Copenhagen City Heart Study (CCHS) for training the ML model and 916 subjects from the LOOP Study for external testing. In total, 126 subjects (4.9%) met the primary endpoint in CCHS, whereas 59 subjects (6.4%) met the primary endpoint in the LOOP Study. The models incorporating signal analysis, both stand-alone and combined with conventional parameters, significantly increased discrimination compared to the baseline model based on conventional parameters in the external test cohort (Baseline model: AUC 0.721, CI 0.639:0.802 vs. signal analytical model: AUC 0.790, CI 0.730:0.850, p = 0.031 and combined model: AUC 0.788, CI 0.727:0.849, p = 0.021).
CONCLUSION: A ML model based on signal analysis of strain and TDI curves from echocardiographic examinations modestly improved 5-year discrimination for incident HF or CV death compared to a model based on conventional echocardiographic parameters.