Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026
Integrating clinical and genomic features to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy in microsatellite-stable rectal cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Lijie, Wang Jingwen, Wan Juefeng, Wang Yan, Zhang Hui, Wang Yaqi, Xia Fan, Shen Lijun, Zhang Zhen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has shifted rectal cancer management toward organ preservation. However, achieving a complete response (CR) for "watch-and-wait" strategies is hindered by high response heterogeneity. Although immunotherapy-combined NAT has expanded the candidate pools, the predictive significance of molecular alterations remains unclear.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate clinical and genomic profiles of rectal cancer patients undergoing NAT to identify response predictors and to develop a nomogram for estimating CR probability.
DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center cohort study.
METHODS: This study included 437 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between December 2019 and March 2023. Patients underwent paired tumor and germline genomic sequencing (887-gene panel) before NAT. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify clinical and genetic risk factors associated with tumor response and long-term survival.
RESULTS: Of the 437 patients, 96.6% had microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors. In the MSS locally advanced rectal cancer cohort (N = 307), the CR rate was 35.5%. Multivariate analysis identified immunotherapy-combined NAT (iTNT) (OR 4.41, 95% CI: 2.42-8.27), SYNE1 mutation (OR 2.12, 95% CI: 1.06-4.26), negative mesorectal fascia (MRF) status (OR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.17-0.66), and lower tumor location (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27-0.84) as independent predictors of CR. KRAS mutation was the sole independent predictor of reduced disease-free survival (DFS; HR 1.93, 95% CI: (1.11-3.36), p = 0.020). KRAS G12D subtype was associated with the worst 2-year distant metastasis-free survival (71.3%) and exhibited a distinct predilection for lung metastasis. The clinical-genomic nomogram yielded strong discrimination (AUC = 0.705) and calibration, with favorable DCA net benefit.
CONCLUSION: Clinical and genomic features jointly determine outcomes in MSS rectal cancer. SYNE1 mutation serves as a novel biomarker for CR, while KRAS mutations, especially the G12D subtype, identify patients at high risk for systemic relapse. The clinical-genomic nomogram facilitates individualized selection for organ-preservation strategies.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate clinical and genomic profiles of rectal cancer patients undergoing NAT to identify response predictors and to develop a nomogram for estimating CR probability.
DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center cohort study.
METHODS: This study included 437 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between December 2019 and March 2023. Patients underwent paired tumor and germline genomic sequencing (887-gene panel) before NAT. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify clinical and genetic risk factors associated with tumor response and long-term survival.
RESULTS: Of the 437 patients, 96.6% had microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors. In the MSS locally advanced rectal cancer cohort (N = 307), the CR rate was 35.5%. Multivariate analysis identified immunotherapy-combined NAT (iTNT) (OR 4.41, 95% CI: 2.42-8.27), SYNE1 mutation (OR 2.12, 95% CI: 1.06-4.26), negative mesorectal fascia (MRF) status (OR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.17-0.66), and lower tumor location (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27-0.84) as independent predictors of CR. KRAS mutation was the sole independent predictor of reduced disease-free survival (DFS; HR 1.93, 95% CI: (1.11-3.36), p = 0.020). KRAS G12D subtype was associated with the worst 2-year distant metastasis-free survival (71.3%) and exhibited a distinct predilection for lung metastasis. The clinical-genomic nomogram yielded strong discrimination (AUC = 0.705) and calibration, with favorable DCA net benefit.
CONCLUSION: Clinical and genomic features jointly determine outcomes in MSS rectal cancer. SYNE1 mutation serves as a novel biomarker for CR, while KRAS mutations, especially the G12D subtype, identify patients at high risk for systemic relapse. The clinical-genomic nomogram facilitates individualized selection for organ-preservation strategies.