American journal of ophthalmology · 2022
Penetrating Keratoplasty Versus Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty for Advanced Stage of Keratoconus.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Feizi Sepehr, Javadi Mohammad Ali, Karimian Farid, Bayat Kia, Bineshfar Niloufar, Esfandiari Hamed
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare visual acuity, refractive error, and complications after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) vs deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in the management of advanced stage of keratoconus.
DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative, interventional study.
METHODS: This study enrolled 411 consecutive keratoconus eyes with preoperative mean keratometry ≥60 diopters (D) that received either PK (218 eyes) or DALK (193 eyes). The outcome measures were postoperative visual acuity, refraction, complications, and further surgical interventions.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 77.9±46.5 and 72.9±47.8 months in the PK and DALK groups, respectively (P = .28). Compared with baseline values, postoperative visual acuity and refraction significantly improved in both groups. Postoperative corrected distance visual acuity was 0.18±0.13 and 0.26±0.19 logMAR in the PK and DALK groups, respectively (P < .001). Postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -2.89±2.89 D after PK and -4.58±3.62 D after DALK (P < .001). Final keratometric astigmatism was comparable between the 2 groups (P = .82). Suture-related complications were observed in 48.6% of the PK eyes and 72.0% of the DALK eyes (P < .001). The incidence of graft rejection was 33.5% after PK and 19.7% after DALK (P = .002). At the last visit, 98.2% of PK grafts and 94.8% of DALK grafts remained clear (P = .06).
CONCLUSION: Both techniques of corneal transplantation led to a significant improvement in the visual and refractive variables in eyes with advanced keratoconus. PK resulted in a better visual acuity and refraction with less suture-related complications compared to DALK. However, PK was associated with a higher rate of graft rejection. The 2 techniques were comparable in terms of graft survival.
DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative, interventional study.
METHODS: This study enrolled 411 consecutive keratoconus eyes with preoperative mean keratometry ≥60 diopters (D) that received either PK (218 eyes) or DALK (193 eyes). The outcome measures were postoperative visual acuity, refraction, complications, and further surgical interventions.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 77.9±46.5 and 72.9±47.8 months in the PK and DALK groups, respectively (P = .28). Compared with baseline values, postoperative visual acuity and refraction significantly improved in both groups. Postoperative corrected distance visual acuity was 0.18±0.13 and 0.26±0.19 logMAR in the PK and DALK groups, respectively (P < .001). Postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -2.89±2.89 D after PK and -4.58±3.62 D after DALK (P < .001). Final keratometric astigmatism was comparable between the 2 groups (P = .82). Suture-related complications were observed in 48.6% of the PK eyes and 72.0% of the DALK eyes (P < .001). The incidence of graft rejection was 33.5% after PK and 19.7% after DALK (P = .002). At the last visit, 98.2% of PK grafts and 94.8% of DALK grafts remained clear (P = .06).
CONCLUSION: Both techniques of corneal transplantation led to a significant improvement in the visual and refractive variables in eyes with advanced keratoconus. PK resulted in a better visual acuity and refraction with less suture-related complications compared to DALK. However, PK was associated with a higher rate of graft rejection. The 2 techniques were comparable in terms of graft survival.