European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
Retrospective analysis of the role of intra-operative parathyroid hormone monitoring during parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism: a single center experience over 2 decades.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Adler Yehonatan, Tzelnick Sharon, Shopen Yoni, Reifen Ella, Bachar Gideon, Shpitzer Thomas, Mizrachi Aviram
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Role of intra-operative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring during parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) has long been debated. Our main goal was to investigate the cure rates of parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism with and without IOPTH monitoring. Our secondary goal was to investigate if operating room time can be saved when IOPTH monitoring is not used.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for PHPT due to a single adenoma between 2004 and 2019 was performed. Cure rates and operating room time were compared.
RESULTS: 423 patients were included. IOPTH was used in 248 patients (59%). Four patients were not cured, two from each group, with no significant difference between the groups (98.8% vs. 99.1%, p = 0.725). Surgery time was significantly longer in the IOPTH group, p < 0.001.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no advantage for using IOPTH during parathyroidectomy in suitable clinical settings. The procedure may be safely performed without IOPTH while achieving non-inferior success rates and reducing operative time.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for PHPT due to a single adenoma between 2004 and 2019 was performed. Cure rates and operating room time were compared.
RESULTS: 423 patients were included. IOPTH was used in 248 patients (59%). Four patients were not cured, two from each group, with no significant difference between the groups (98.8% vs. 99.1%, p = 0.725). Surgery time was significantly longer in the IOPTH group, p < 0.001.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no advantage for using IOPTH during parathyroidectomy in suitable clinical settings. The procedure may be safely performed without IOPTH while achieving non-inferior success rates and reducing operative time.